all 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 57 points 2 years ago
[โ€“] 50 points 2 years ago

RedHat and Hashicorp under IBM. Hmm, that doesn't bode well for the future.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    https://opentofu.org/ is apparently the community fork of terraform

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 26 points 2 years ago

    The kiss of death

  • source
  • [โ€“] 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I know people hear Hashicorp and instantly think Terraform, but Vault is the real crown jewel here.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 2 years ago

    RIP, wanted to implement that, but fuck it. Last time I needed to list versions of IBM MQ (contractor uses it, so I had to replicate it in local env) - and I fucking couldn't. How can someone make such a dumb fucking website is beyond me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    [โ€“] 18 points 2 years ago
    [โ€“] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So let me get this straight: Hashicorp gets private equity'd, changes its license to be a rentseeker against Amazon and Google, and now sells itself to the OG rentseeker.

    What the fuck happened to open source?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 2 years ago

    I would argue "open source". I've paid attention to hashicorp for a while. They were always about "getting that bag". Open source was a means to their ends.

    Something was fucky with them since day 1 and the fact many companies were openly using alpha software on production environments (my work included). Always rubbed me the wrong way.

    For good open source look at apps like Zabbix.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    Turns out that IBM is leading OpenTofu efforts. Nevermind, it's OpenBao they are working on (Hashicorp Vault FOSS fork), we might just be done here.

    Also Pulumi is technically fucked too. Back to good old shell scripting boys

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [โ€“] 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Turns out that IBM is leading OpenTofu efforts.

    IBM is in no way involved in OpenTofu. Afaik they are involved in OpenBao.

    Source: I'm the technical lead of the OpenTofu project.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Isn't Pulumi moving to native API stuff instead of the tf provider?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They wish. Nobody is gonna replicate that effort successfully any time soon.

    Youโ€™d sooner get the cloud providers to standardize on an api.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I mean, they have AWS Native (in preview) and Azure Native. So it's a little more substantial than a wish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 2 years ago

    Crossplane has also had internal providers in development for 3 years. Bottom line is unless the actual cloud provider is devoting developer resources to a provider(like they do for the TF providers), it's unlikely to happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I guess I need to start looking deeper into this, and the potential for importing existing infrastructures into pulumi's purview. But I'm hesitant - I don't want pulumi to pull a Hashicorp. I'm wondering if it's best to just go with CFN and Bicep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Fffffffffffuuuuuuuu

  • source
  • [โ€“] 9 points 2 years ago

    hashicorp's APIs will be right at home at IBM. Right along with HCL. not a fan of either but have been forced to use them. this might bode well for my future if a pending license change is coming.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Damn, iirc someone (forgot who) actually called it at the beginning of terraform debacle, though it was redhat instead of ibm, but close enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 2 years ago

    They missed April fools by about a month

  • source
  • [โ€“] 6 points 2 years ago

    IBM: Hi guys. Can I be relevant again? Guys? Guys hello.... Hello?

  • source
  • [โ€“] 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    HashiCorp provides a suite of tools intended to support the development and deployment of large-scale service-oriented software installations. Each tool is aimed at specific stages in the life cycle of a software application, with a focus on automation. Many have a plugin-oriented architecture in order to provide integration with third-party technologies and services.[16] Additional proprietary features for some of these tools are offered commercially and are aimed at enterprise customers.[17]

    Can someone tell me what this actually means?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [โ€“] 19 points 2 years ago*

    Imagine what happen when you bought a new computer. You'll install an os, then install all apps you need, copy over all data you need, etc. Now imagine if you have 100 of new computers. The tools hashicorp made basically enable you to create a recipe to perform all this operation over a fleet of servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 3 points 2 years ago
    [โ€“] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Just as we were building out our terraform deployments... Not a good omen.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments