top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 94 points 2 years ago

Its no wonder Amazon wanted to build there. Poor people make for cheap labour. It might even have been a good deal for Mississippi if they had forced Amazon to allow unions there for getting a free pass!

  • source
  • [–] 68 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And in 5 years they are going to automate the entire thing providing precisely 0 jobs to the local economy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    That would be pretty rough. Outcompete all the other employers in town so they all go out of business and then automate all the jobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I mean, that's literally what Amazon does. Anyone remember diapers.com? Amazon lowered their prices on diapers, losing at least $200 million, to stop diapers.com's growth. When the business started losing money, Amazon bought them, and then shut them down.

    Then immediately raised their prices on diapers. I fucking hate Amazon, like, literally refuse to purchase anything from them. I'd rather pay 3 times the price then give Amazon a penny for literally anything.

    They're already implementing automation and robots into their warehouses, once one of their engineers making six figures (compared to Bezos's billions) comes up with a way to automate delivery, you can bet your ass and mine they'll drop all of their subcontracting delivery companies with zero notice or fucks given. I'm amazed they haven't gone after chewy.com or barkbox, but maybe they are.

    I remember back in like 2015-2017, when I finally swore off Amazon, I posted on Reddit asking what other shopping sites people recommended that weren't Amazon, and was downvoted and chastised for even asking because not wanting to suck Amazon's Dick-of-Convenience wasn't comprehendible, and look where that fucking got us.

    Sorry, this is a long response to your comment, and that's the end of my rant, but just... Fuck Amazon, to the moon and back... Twice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Doesn’t Walmart still employ more people?

    I agree with every you said, just thought Walmart still held the exploited labor crown.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I'm honestly not sure who employs more people, but I would imagine Walmart does since, despite all of their BS (their employees being paid so low they're on food stamps so we, the taxpayer, are subsidizing their pay, union busting, etc), everyone working in Walmart is a Walmart employee.

    Amazon uses a shit ton of subcontractors, in contrast, for a lot of their stuff. I was briefly a delivery driver for them, but officially worked for an LLC despite wearing an Amazon uniform and driving an Amazon van, delivering Amazon packages and having to adhere to all Amazon policies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I fucking hate Amazon, like, literally refuse to purchase anything from them. I'd rather pay 3 times the price then give Amazon a penny for literally anything.

    I like you, man.

    Let me just plug here 2nd hand stores and just not buying stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    That's the plan. And they are barely being subtle about it. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/operations/how-amazon-deploys-robots-in-its-operations-facilities https://www.geekwire.com/2023/amazon-unveils-sequoia-warehouse-robotics-system-and-starts-testing-agilitys-digit-robot/ https://www.engadget.com/amazon-says-its-new-ai-powered-robots-reduce-fulfilment-time-by-25-percent-122517342.html

    There are so many more. The end goal is fully automated fulfillment canters and automated drone delivery. The company who currently employs more people than any other in the country is 100% trying to eliminate the "labor" line item on their balance sheet.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Didn't you kick us out and ruin some perfectly good tea over something something representation?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    data centers have low personell overhead don't they? Didn't some state nix their data center incentives precisely because of how few jobs they bring vs how much utilities they consume.

    The only reason I can think of building it there is easy access to water.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Yeah I think it's funny that the bill specifically says that they have to add 50 jobs a year but it doesn't say 50 high paying jobs just 50 jobs. If they hire 50 janitors a year that fulfills their quota. And, not to put too fine a point on it but Mississippi's population is over 2,961,279 and 19.1%(the number of people under the poverty line in Mississippi) is 565,604. 50 jobs a year isn't going to do fuckall for that state. But I sure as hell bet that the Republicans in there State legislature are going to have their pockets well lined.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No comment on the accuracy of their prediction but they claim:

    The project is the largest economic development project in Mississippi’s entire history and is expected to create at least 1,000 “high-paying, high-tech” jobs by 2034.

    If that comes to pass, that’s a big deal and this type of facility and these jobs do not just walk away when the incentives end

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    1,000 jobs for people they will probably ship in from out of state to meet the qualifications they need. Versus over 500,000 in the state who are poverty stricken.

    Oh yeah that's a real good deal. /s

    These kinds of projects are great when they bring in tax revenue that will benefit the state and allow them to distribute to the most unfortunate... but I guess that's not going to happen since they're getting a tax break of 100%.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Eat the rich. Fucking disgusting.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 48 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why do you think they have the highest rate of poverty? They give all their money to people who don't need it.

    It's kinda like when David Cross said, of the south, someone who's morbidly obese yet still malnourished comes from there.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    But seriously when are we gonna eat Bezos? I'm a vegetarian but I'll take a bite of the billionaire to show my commitment. I'll bring coleslaw.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Nobody's brave enough to start the process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Exactly.

    It will never be more than just talk. The time for that kind of action was in the distant distant past. Like history book past. I seriously doubt we could ever do something like that in the United States.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean, for large changes yeah probably. But someone on his security team could probably snap tomorrow and off him.

    If we ever get like humans backed up into software that will really be game over

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    By the way, if Amazon is doing a project for them, that actually means they're not just paying Zero in taxes, they're also getting paid by the state.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    But jerbs creetion!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    I mean, Mississippi probably is a good place to put things if you're looking for low labor costs and need to be in the US anyway, even without negotiating a tax break.

    I'm not sure that it's the best place to put datacenters, though, which is what this appears to be. Mississippi's got a warm climate, and datacenters tend to need to spend on cooling.

    googles

    https://dataspan.com/blog/data-center-cooling-costs/

    How much does it cost to cool a data center? A cooling system is one of the most expensive parts of any data center.  According to research, anywhere between 30% to 55% of a data center’s energy consumption goes into powering its cooling and ventilation systems — with the average hovering around 40%.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Mississippi is the very definition of geologically stable. Weather events are rare enough. Tornados aren't much of a thing. Katrina levelled Gulfport like a nuclear bomb but go as far as Hattiesburg and there were only a few shingles blown off.

    As for cooling, water is plentiful.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Where do the $10 billion AMZN bucks go? Do any at all go to MS public coffers? The construction will be done by provate companies, components bought from private companies. How about electricity and water? Do those costs go to publicly owned infrastructure? What about the land, surely it's leased but is it owned by the state of MS? If it's just a $10 billion expenditure from Amazon to other corporations and hedge funds it's pretty worthless to the general public, and giving corporate welfare instead of cOMpEtiNG iN ThE fReE MArkET makes it actively harmful to the public good. How many people with potentially groundbreaking ideas will continue to be wage slaves because their state has no grant money to help them start a business? How many children will continue the cycle of poverty (working for Amazon in this case, probably) because their municipality doesn't have fully staffed schools to help them learn to think critically and guide them to scholarships etc.?

    AMZN is up 2.8% today.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›