top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 127 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Your momma's anus is much larger than Antarctica.

    How's it feel coming back atcha buddy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 84 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Tbf looking upward at the sky is a lot easier than taking a giant wooden coffin over thousands of miles of water to find an icy hells ape where almost nothing can survive

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    icy hells ape

    Yeah, that's fucking terrifying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    tbf, discovering Uranus was a lot less deadly before modern icebreaking ships. Age of Sail ships did not do well down there, and the economic incentives of sealing resulted in quite a lot of casualties back in the day. Doing math and peering through telescopes is much safer.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If our main sensory organs were sound-based or feel-based, we'd probably have discovered a lot of things before planets and stars.

    The things that took a while to discover on earth, or that aren't yet fully explored, are largely because it's hard to see them without getting very close, which can be hard.

    Building a good telescope might have been hard, but with a telescope you can see things that are millions of km away. But, because of the earth's curvature, you can't see Antarctica until you're practically next to Antarctica. You can't see the bottom of the ocean until you travel to the bottom of the ocean, or at least until you scan it with sound waves which are then converted into something you can see.

    Imagine an alien that developed in the water on a planet with sub-surface oceans with ice on top. No real value for eyes, so they're sound / touch based. Picture what it would be like to try to explore the solar system. There's a boundary layer at the top of their "atmosphere" (the top of the ocean) that's solid (ice), beyond that there's some non-liquid extremely sparse stuff, until some point where no sound travels at all and there's nothing to touch.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Reminds me of Rocky from Project Hail Mary (sort of, they didn't live under ocean but under an extremely hostile-to-us atmosphere).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    “The” Antarctica

    I mean, I guess there’s only one

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's only until we discover the second one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I assure you that Uranus has been observed many times by many people dating far back into the past, such as by Hipparchos in 2nd Century BC. They conclusively figured out exactly what it was in 1846.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago*

    The Sirius star(s) 8000 light away was discovered before Europe.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Well, we currently know better the moon's surface than our oceans' bottom, so...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    It's almost like building telescopes is a bit easier than month-long marine expeditions.

    Well I guess it's not immediately apparent. But in hindsight, the kind of telescope you need to see the moon or Uranus isn't quite the investment that a dangerous expedition to unknown lands or the bottom of the sea entails. Nor an observatory or space-bourne telescope for that matter. And you can't use a telescope to discover a continent on earth unless you were already in space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Yup, if I'm not mistaken, more people went on the Moon than to Challenger Deep. I'm wondering if it would be the same case if the Cold War hadn't started the race to the Moon.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    It's like it tell my kids, you have to look under and behind things…

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Is this the same "discovered" as America was "discovered" in 1492?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Actually no, I don't think there were any people living in Antarctica.. but I could be wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    But were there people living in the southern hemisphere who knew not to go further south because they'd reach the icy land of certain death?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    Probably not. They knew not to go further south because they'd reach the icy ocean of certain death. Because there's no land at 60° South, the winds and currents whip around Antarctica in an uninterrupted circle and there are 100 kph winds and 10+ meter waves most of the time.

    See also: "Roaring Forties," "Furious Fifties," and "Screaming Sixties"

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    I don’t know about you, but I find seeing things to be much easier when there isn’t a planet obscuring it.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Piri reis knew of Antarctica back in the 16th century or something I unno I am no earth scientist

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Ooh old cartography I can actually call semi bullshit on this. Basically we knew about a fuckoff big landmass we now call Antarctica (then hypothesized to be Terra Australis) due to the ocean currents around it, but we kept fucking up its location for some reason. Misidentification of Antarctica got so bad that Australia was the most nothern part of it hence why the naming is wrong.

    Also a lot of maps made Tierra del Fuego look like it was part of the at the time hypothesized Terra Australas, as I said the misidentification problem got real fucking bad at times. But yeah we knew there was a continent or somethijg down there we just couldnt get to the damned thing because it was too hazardous.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I read about the Antarctic. They kept running into walls of ice before they could find/see it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    To be fair, we don't usually have a clear line of sight to Antarctica.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    But you can see one in your backyard sometimes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Mars surface is studied better than Earth in 2024. Because there are no oceans or trees on Mars.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Some people today couldn't find Uranus with both hands and a flashlight.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›