top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 193 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 72 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

    well, not mine. i used a script to replace all of my comments with gibberish before i deleted them and then my account. if they went back and restored my comments, then all they'll get is comments full of gibberish, especially since i overwrote them 3 times before deleting them, just in case they tried to roll back to the previous version.

    have fun with that!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I like your style, but honestly I wouldn't be surprised if they keep every single version.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    i bet they do now, but i've checked back now and then, and all of my comments and posts are most assuredly gone.

    edit: i've gone back to check some old haunts, place i know i've commented, and i did some seaching with google using my old usernames, as google uses its cache to match to the posts\comments, even though they're not there any more.

    i see old posts that are graveyards of deleted comments, some with simply deleted accounts, and many others where both the account and comment are deleted. i don't see any gibberish comments. the ones i know are mine (because replies quote the comment above, which i recognize as mine), are all just deleted in their entirety, so it seems they didn't do comment versioning, at least not past the first edit. i see no posts under any former username of mine.

    the efforts to scrub my content from reddit last May appears to have worked. sadly, since the API lockdown, those tools no longer work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    Yeah.....all that comment data isn't really that large. They'll have backups captured for likely several years back. All you can view is the info on the current live servers. You might have kept them from getting like 3 months worth of your comments at best.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    I did the same, but we're both fools if we think reddit didn't keep every character we typed (yet alone submitted) in a private, proprietary database.

    We weren't paid for our data. We were given access to a website free of charge. The consent we gave was supposed to be for the operation of the website, not for training AI.

    They should fucking pay us.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 120 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In other news, spez's compensation from reddit last year was $193 million, and it's COO got a cool $93 million.

    C'mon, spez, tell us again how horrible it's been that reddit's never made a profit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So Reddit charges users to create content (paid premium or by showing ads). And then it sells that content.

    Making money both going and coming.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I wonder if there is any legal standing for users to sue Reddit for a fair share of those profits. That’d be nice if it could happen. But i suspect, probably not.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Their TOS says they own your content in any current or future formats or derivative works.

    I’d say Reddit would win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Their TOS says they own your content in any current or future formats or derivative works.

    Their ToS could say they own you and your children and grandchildren, but that doesn't make it enforceable.

    If I post a frame from the movie Akira on Reddit would any reasonable person suggest that they own not only that frame, but also the entire movie that it came from as a derivative work? There is a glut of second-hand data just like that all over Reddit, Twitter, and every other social media network, and I'm willing to bet that's also part of what's being sold.

    But hey... I'm not saying you're wrong, just that the idea that they automatically "own" the things that people post on their website is ridiculous. It's a bit like UPS or FedEx saying they own the contents of your package while delivering it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The TOS shouldn't hold up in court. A contract must be an exchange of two things, eg money for a product or service. You can't say "Our service is free of charge!!!" And then in the fine print "(((But also you agree to give us everything we can take free of charge)))".

    The issue is how everyone does it. Facebook and Google started when data had no value, now they're amongst the wealthiest businesses in the world. Now, Microsoft have joined in, *even though you already pay for their products and services anyway!"

    However, the other aspect is that everyone is a victim. Lawmakers are the victim. They still haven't quite yet realised how much is being taken from them (at least $50 per year, probably more like $1,000 per year if not more for prominent figures) but they are still being abused.

    It's like that form of bank fraud, where the criminal takes pennies from accounts, hoping the user won't notice and the bank will write it off. Do it to enough people and enough times and you can make millions. They do this to everyone and they make billions.

    Either the data is public domain and they don't have to pay for it, but also cannot charge others for it, or the data is private and they must pay the author a fair share.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, probably not. When you sign up and agreed to their ToS, they don't "own" your content, but you grant them a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, and sublicensable license to use it without compensation.

    From their ToS:

    Any ideas, suggestions, and feedback about Reddit or our Services that you provide to us are entirely voluntary, and you agree that Reddit may use such ideas, suggestions, and feedback without compensation or obligation to you

    Source: A pretty good post on r/HFY, though it is on Reddit, so don't click it if you don't want to :P

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There is legal standing, IMO. You can't take something without consideration, and access to the website was granted free of charge while the data collection was squirrelled away in the fine print. That isn't a lawful contract, the fine print is for technicalities about the main transaction of X in exchange for Y. You can't say "we'll give you X for free!!!” then sneak into the fine print "(((you also give us Y for free)))". The structure is clearly deceptive in a manner that is designed to prevent a fair assessment of the value being exchanged.

    Insurers have to provide a "key facts page" where they summarise in plain English what you're paying for. The fine print gives the detail, but the front page is still "we give you X in exchange for Y".

    You can't build a car without paying for the nuts and bolts. Tech companies have placed themselves amongst the wealthiest businesses in the world without paying for the nuts and bolts we provide.

    Hell, even Microsoft is in on it now, even though you pay for Windows and Office 365!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago

    ... and thats why Wikipedia is non-profit.

    Seeing human (even shitpost) achievements get monetized (in the most sucky manner) one by one is sad af.

  • source
  • [+] 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I hope my fuck Spez comments are useful.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago*

    Reddit says it's made $203M so far licensing its our data

    Fixed that for them.

    There's your "tragedy of the commons" fallacy on a stick, folks - the proles where managing reddit so well that huffman had to break it in order to make it more vulnerable to the parasites.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago

    It's data?! You mean our data

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    This is helpful of them, once the EU court fines them, we can quickly calculate how much that will be.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    These are totally the signs of a stable and profitable company.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    I wonder if they will ever consider paying the users for the content they provide that constitutes "its" data. 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    A good reminder to go back and edit all your comments to [removed] if you didn't do so when you first left.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    How? They're under heavy scrutiny from the FTC over the $60M/month Google deal. Where did the extra $140M come from?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Spez will be happy to know his payout is covered, company is still going to be broke though.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Probably doesn't matter, but this is why I deleted my account instead of just locking it up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    With google being the partner i bet the deal wont mention they cant use older backups of reddit that they most certainly have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    "its data".

    Ah yes... of course.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    For everybody who thinks we should get paid for our data, you may want to consider the Data Dividend Project:

    https://www.datadividendproject.com/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›