top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 149 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Wait, that's actually a real poster? What. The. Fuck.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 216 points 2 years ago (27 children)

    Yea, both were drunk but fuck Jake and his rights because he has the penis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I can understand and appreciate the intentions, but there are few things worse than good intentions without intelligence, flexibility and nuance, as the statements below seem accurate and feel utterly screwed up:

    He got drunk and had sex with a woman - HE goes to jail.
    She got drunk and had sex with a man - HE goes to jail.

    It's almost like what Public Enemy said in "Fear Of A Black Planet":
    Black man, black woman - black baby
    White man, black woman - black baby
    Black man, white woman - black baby

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (26 replies)
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (34 children)

    I mean, it is more than a bit sexist but... that is probably the demographic who need to understand this in a college environment.

    Consent is incredibly important and a LOT of media for the past few decades shat on it. No, I don't (just) mean how basically every movie in the 80s was about raping people. I mean even "Okay, what if we got you/her drunk?" and so forth. I want to say even Friends and Seinfeld played the idea of one of the guys getting their girlfriend drunk for laughs (well, I think Jerry used turkey?).

    Reminding people "that is a crime and you can go to jail" is important... even if people rapidly learn that rich white guys never go to jail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I know two males who were raped by women when unconscious in college, and neither of them were okay with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    People always picture a huge unattractive woman when this gets brought up.

    But one of my college roommates got raped by a girl who was at least "an 8".

    They had hooked when he was blackout and she was just tipsy. He wanted nothing to do with her tho, and told her that repeatedly. She was just hot, young, and had never been turned down before.

    So like a week later we have a party he's not at. She showed up early, had two beers, then went to "wait" in his bed. Even though everyone was telling her not to do that.

    When he shows up, still wants nothing to do with her, so just gets blacked out at the party instead of kicking her out of his bed asap. I guess trying to wait her out and hoping she'd eventually give up.

    By the time he finally goes to bed, he's blacked out and she's been in there line 6-8 hours and completely sober.

    Next morning she teased him about how they had sex again but he kept falling asleep during it.

    If he was a chick, no one would argue that the second time was rape. Hell, we'd have probably fought a guy if he kept insisting he was going to "wait" in a drunk girls bed who was clear she didn't want anything to do with him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (33 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 108 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    I'm not a law talking guy, this isn't the law, and it isn't ethical best practice but it might help people understand the reasonableness of the poster.

    I believe it's true that drunk people can't consent. I think that what juries are likely to actually care about is the question:

    Did the accused have the reasonable belief that the plaintiff would consent to sex while sober?

    If you're in a police interview or a trial and are asked:

    What made you think the plaintiff consented to your actions?

    And all you can say without perjuring yourself is:

    I vaguely recall that they seemed kinda into it, and they didn't say no, oh! and they didn't fight back.

    You're going to have a bad time. ESPECIALLY if you've been drinking, because it will be easier to question the reasonableness of your belief in their consent.

    This poster is clearly meant for a place similar to a university dormitory.

    This poster is bad because: it makes the law seem lopsided, and perpetuates sexist ideas about gender and sex.

    The poster is good because: unfortunately, too many men think that if a girl is drunk at a place where he thinks the girls are looking for drunk hookups, that she consents to whatever she doesn't fight (and maybe more). Too many men misunderstand consent and have dangerous ideas about what women really want. It's much better they be scared into over thinking whether they're risking arrest than that they rape somebody.

    Obviously more nuance is good, but if you're trying to stop drunk 18 year olds from raping/being raped, taping up a poster like this in the stairwell is more effective than taping up an essay.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I think the issue with this poster is that it's SO lopsided that it doesn't make any sense. They're outlining a very specific scenario that implies that only males can rape, and that males are more capable of decision making when drunk than females. It's simultaneously misogynist and misandrist.

    A much better take on a college campus night be to illustrate different levels of drunkenness. Alice was sloshed and Bob was tipsy. Or illustrate that the same quantity of alcohol can lead to vastly different levels of intoxication. Alice and Bob both had 3 drinks. Alice is sloshed, bob is tipsy.

    As is, if I had seen this poster during any developmental years I'd have written it off as bs propaganda and done what I was gonna do anyway. Fortunately, that's not-raping in my case, but for some people, it may be a bit blurrier. And, at worst, some people may see this, see how horribly lopsided it is, and decide it MUST be full of shit and do the opposite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 95 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Males can consent while drunk, females can't.. bullshit it isn't equal.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 73 points 2 years ago

    I hate how this also manages to objectify women.

  • source
  • [–] 72 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    So what if it's two men? Or two women?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 70 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    If Josie killed someone while being drunk, would that mean she should get a lower sentence because she cannot be held responsible for her actions while intoxicated?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 68 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Why does this only apply to women though?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    So according to this, every time a lady and I hook up after a few drinks it's rape? The fuck?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 49 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This poster is so old, it probably from the 1990's

    Yes, it is dumb. Yes it is sexist. But it is not the consensus of society. Not by a long shot.

    That doesn't prevent incels from bringing it up every time some women thinks they are a creep, just so they can hate on how "disadvantaged we males are compared to women" and how "any type of relationship with women are bound to be awful for the man".

    Both sexes have advantages and disadvantages. Whining about this same issue over and over without actually doing something about it isn't helping anything. And neither is blaming the opposite sex.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    My mother was a sexual assault response coordinator (SARC) for the military in the early aughts. This led to some really weird situations for us as a family, like having to pretend we didn't know why this strange woman who wasn't here when we went to bed last night is now having breakfast with us. The worst one was probably when it was a friend of mine having breakfast with us. Anyway, my mother really impressed on me that it did not matter if the woman initiated, if I was drunk as well, that I should not, under any circumstances, engage in drunken hookups. I disagree that when two drunk (hetero) people have sex, the man is automatically a rapist. But at the end of the day, my opinion doesn't matter. The law does. Keep this in mind, fellas, get her number instead. The risk ain't worth it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    This is such bullshit. What happens if she is the one raping? She's excused and guy is still guilty? Moronic.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Drunk people can consent. Being drunk doesn't make you do things you don't want to do. It's not a magic potion for fuck sake

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago

    Given this poster is over 15 years old and only a handful were printed, I'm gonna guess no.

    https://www.dailydot.com/irl/anti-rape-poster-reddit-conversations/

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    As a 53 yo male, this poster makes me angry.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago*

    The poster is funny, but apart of the outrage that is causes by some, I think that it could trigger a good discussion.

    For instance about how toxic masculinity also hurts men. Under that men are considered weak if they cry and should consider themselves be 'lucky' when they are raped.

    And how feminism can help against this as well.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What if we're both alcoholics that are always drunk?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    God damnit Josie, put that pussycat away

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    If you enter into a binding contract with someone while they are intoxicated to the point of impairment, the contract can be invalidated on those grounds as long as impairment can be proven in a court.

    You can't give reasonable consent while impaired. If it can be further demonstrated that one party intentionally attempted to induce intoxication for the purposes of attaining contractual consent, they can be held criminally liable for that act.

    Consent isn't only about sex. It's much murkier and dubious in cases of mutual intoxication and interpersonal relations. This poster is simply trying to make people aware of fairly basic laws regarding consent in the United States. And it's worth knowing.

    Men generally have a higher tolerance for alcohol than women even if they are equal height and weight due to differences in alcohol metabolism. There's perhaps some embedded sexism in this poster's standards, but it's better to be informed than incarcerated.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›