top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 127 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I don't need or want any of that AI crap in my browser. Hopefully there will be a compiler flag to disable it.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 104 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    For what it's worth... I think there are useful AI tools. For example the offline translation feature that doesn't send your content to google is something they recently introduced. I'd also like to see someone compete with a decent and open text-to-speech solution that gets wide adoption... And the idea of flagging fake reviews doesn't sound too bad (I haven't tried it.) I mean people are complaining about SEO making google unusable and fake news only ever getting more. I can see some benefit there - if done right.

    But we definitely don't need a Clippy 2.0 or another smart assistant. And I don't think everything has to be embedded in a browser and make it yet more complicated and bigger, or implemented in the operating system. An add-on will probably do.

    (Edit: And I sometimes don't understand Mozilla. Why not focus on their core product and make that exceptionally great? If they're already struggling... What's with all these side-projects and dabbling in AI anyways?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 120 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Can they just focus on the browser? I really don't need the AI stuff.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    The issue is that Firefox alone doesn't pay the bills and I'd imagine they really want to get away from being dependent on the Google deal they have.

    We don't need AI stuff but if they can get some good funding from it, they can put more into the browser

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 74 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Focusing on FF: Yay!

    Adding AI to FF: NOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooo!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 2 years ago

    Mozilla downsizes as it refocuses on Firefox and AI drops multiple products and layoff 60 so that its current budget can accomodate the stratospheric compensation of its new CEO.

  • source
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    fuuk this AI bubble. the browser is one place where ai is not needed

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago*

    I dunno, having a free, open model made by a trusted company would be nice. I like initiatives like Mozilla Voice, this could be something similar. Probably not great if it's replacing focus on the other things though.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago

    it refocuses on Firefox

    🤩

    and AI

    😩

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I love Firefox. Don't screw it up, Mozilla.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Sigh, and here I was, thinking Microsoft trying to shove its useless (to me) AI down my throat at every opportunity was annoying... Quo vadis Mozilla, what are you guys doing... :(

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Ai is coming either way. It’s not really avoidable, and if Mozilla were to divest from that area too they would set themselves up for failure. A few years down the road all browsers will have some sort of ai integration, perhaps large parts of the web too. If Mozilla doesn’t keep up it will just become entirely irrelevant and the internet will be fully controlled by google and its chromium bs.

    Besides, what they did so far is really neat and how I would like to see ai integrated: offline translation features on your local device, not somewhere under control of some corporation. More of that please

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Unfortunately Mozilla's brand new CEO is a McKinsey ghoul: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chamberslaura/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    She spent 2 yrs at McK 20+ yrs ago - hardly a personality-defining milestone, given how a lot of business students start their career in consulting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    I mean that's pretty standard for a McKinsey ghoul:

    • Step 1: go to an ivy league college, get a business degree
    • Step 2: work for McKinsey for a few years as an associate
    • Step 3: get a job at a McKinsey client leapfrogging everyone else into management/c-suite
    • Step 4: hire McKinsey to bring their arrogant children into your org and screw things up

    Everything about her subsequent career has been going from one upper management/c-suite role in a tech company to another. This is not the resume of a person who should be running a nonprofit that controls the most important open source project on the internet. But beyond that just look at what she's done in her one month at Mozilla:

      1. Massive round of layoffs
      1. "Focus on {buzzword}" where {buzzword} in this case is AI

    That's straight out of the McKinsey playbook.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    While we resourced mozilla.social heavily to pursue this ambitious idea,

    How many people do you need to administer a Mastodon instance? I'm pretty sure infosec.exchange is like one dude.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber

    IMO these were their best products. 🙁

    Going forward, the company said in an internal memo, Mozilla will focus on bringing “trustworthy AI into Firefox.” To do so, it will bring together the teams that work on Pocket, Content and AI/Ml.

    Ugh, god damn it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The worst enemy of Mozilla is: Mozilla. This hasn't changed in many years.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber, which launched only a week ago.

    I just purchased an annual plan for Monitor, partially to help Mozilla. I guess this is my thanks

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I thought they switched CEOs to focus on privacy a week or so ago?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    We dont want AI or pocket you assholes. We want a secure browser. Stop wasting your money on this shit

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Let's skip the AI and give thunderbird some love instead. Then again, it's pretty feature complete as is. Just keep it up to date to keep running and secure.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 10 points 2 years ago

    This is awful lol

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    That interim CEO seems like they suck; I hope they don't stay.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Oh for Fox’s sake!!!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I didn't realize Lemmy hated AI so much. Pretty much every post in this thread is bashing the idea. I've found AI to be very useful personally, I use it almost every day. It helped me code a VBA macro from scratch with 0 experience. This tool is saving me and my team hundreds of hours per year. It's also great just as an improved search engine.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Kinda disappointing how much of the community just takes a giant 💩 on Mozilla whatever it does these days. Funding open source is super crazy hard folks. Notice that the really successful well funded projects are fueled by megacorps?

    Offering constructive criticism is great but if you don't have better ideas around how to fund an open browser without selling your soul to GOOG or MSFT then perhaps your energy might be better spent elsewhere.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Lots of immediate hate for AI, but I'm all for local AI if they keep that direction. Small models are getting really impressive, and if they have smaller, fine-tuned, specific-purpose AI over the "general purpose" LLMs, they'd be much more efficient at their jobs. I've been rocking local LLMs for a while and they've been great as a small compliment to language processing tasks in my coding.

    Good text-to-speech, page summarization, contextual content blocking, translation, bias/sentiment detection, click bait detection, article re-titling, I'm sure there's many great use cases. And purely speculation,but many traditional non-llm techniques might be able to included here that were overlooked because nobody cared about AI features, that could be super lightweight and still helpful.

    If it goes fully remote AI, it loses a lot of privacy cred, and positions itself really similarly to where everyone else is. From a financial perspective, bandwagoning on AI in the browser but "we won't send your data anywhere" seems like a trendy, but potentially helpful and effective way to bring in a demographic interested in it without sacrificing principles.

    But there's a lot of speculation in this comment. Mozilla's done a lot for FOSS, and I get they need monetization outside of Google, but hopefully it doesn't lead things astray too hard.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 6 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    After installing a new interim CEO earlier this month, Mozilla, the organization behind the Firefox browser, is making some major changes to its product strategy, TechCrunch has learned.

    Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber, which launched only a week ago.

    Going forward, the company said in an internal memo, Mozilla will focus on bringing “trustworthy AI into Firefox.” To do so, it will bring together the teams that work on Pocket, Content and AI/Ml.

    Mozilla started expanding its product portfolio in recent years, all while its flagship product, Firefox, kept losing market share.

    And while the organization was often sharply criticized for this, its leadership argued that diversifying its product portfolio beyond Firefox was necessary to ensure Mozilla’s survival in the long run.

    Firefox, after all, provided the vast majority of Mozilla’s income, but it also meant the organization was essentially dependent on Google to continue this deal.


    The original article contains 234 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 29%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    A reminder that there are many firefox forks that exist if base firefox is adding unwanted things or you might have different wants, but sites will still "see" firefox in terms of compatibility. I'm using Librewolf with some annoyances (it doesn't let things fingerprint to the point that it can't even get your current time), but overall I like it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›