Twitter is threatening legal action against the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a nonprofit that researches hate speech and content moderation on social media platforms.

The letter from Twitter's lawyers alleges that CCDH's research publications are intended to 'harm Twitter's business by driving advertisers away from the platform with incendiary claims.'

This is a pretty bold move from Twitter, especially considering that CCDH is a well-respected organization that has been doing this kind of research for years. And it's especially ironic coming from Elon Musk, who has said that he's a 'free speech absolutist.'

But Musk has also shown that he's sensitive to criticism, so it's not surprising that he's taking this kind of action against CCDH

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 149 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Please, please do that. I can’t wait to see the discovery portion of the trial

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 125 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Elon used to love saying he was a Free Speech Absolutist, but once again that only extends to speech he likes.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 110 points 3 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 105 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I love it. The gist is:

    • hate speech is running rampant on your platform.
    • you're doing nothing to stop it.
    • here's our evidence.
    • where's your e idence?
    • why are you spending time and money on fighting us instead of on fighting the literal white supremacist death threats on your platform?
    • telling us we've not sampled enough tweets while you're in the process of making impossible the mass sampling of tweets is...a bit rich.
    • we're not intimidated by your threats
    • your threats are also bullshit
    • we're not gonna stop

    It's a textbook example of "no u" in grown up language. Bravo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Legal snark is by far the most expensive brand of humor, but when it's deployed on your behalf it's so goddamn satisfying.

    During a hearing in my divorce, I answered a question from the judge, the other lawyer says "we can't have hearsay in this discussion", my lawyer responds "well this will be a short hearing then because everything in your client's motion is hearsay".

    That little snap cost me about $15 but it was worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 83 points 3 years ago

    The best part of it:

    If your clients do file suit, please be advised that CCDH intends to seek immediate discovery regarding hate speech and misinformation on the Twitter platform; Twitter’s policies and practices relating to these issues; and Twitter’s advertising revenue. In that event, a court will determine for itself the truth of the statements in our client’s report in accordance with the time-tested rules of civil procedure and evidence.

    Now that is a nuclear statement in a lawyers letter...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 66 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    It's a shame that people are still using that platform.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 51 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Evidence based documentation is going to be hard to win against, unless the plan is just drag them through legal proceedings until they can't afford it. The american dream.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 49 points 3 years ago

    For a company that claims to be desperate to cut costs they sure do have a lot of money for frivolous lawsuits...

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Does Stinky believe that by suing these researchers, the rise in hate speech didn't happen?!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    Just donated to the CCDH, they definitely don't have the resources to fight Twitter alone.

    Given that Twitter trust and safety was almost completely gutted upon his acquisition, I think it's very improbable that type of content was moderated effectively.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 43 points 3 years ago

    The man-child billionaire says he is not for censorship, while using the judicial system to censor.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    We don’t need to call it X or even the platform formerly known as Twitter. It’s just Twitter.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 32 points 3 years ago

    This is a great example of a SLAPP suit

  • source
  • [+] 28 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)
    [–] 27 points 3 years ago

    Sue everyone you don't like. That's the thin-skinned, narcissistic billionaire way.

    Doesn't matter if they're right or wrong, pile up the costs and they'll all cave in.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I think Elon's rebranding from "twitter" to "X, The Social Media Platform Formerly Known As Twitter" was really smart. You know what, I am gonna go XTSMPFKAST-eet that right now! Obviously the branding was the weakest part of the product he bought!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 25 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    If they go to court, wouldn't the court make them prove that the claim was false or defamation? And if CCDH can prove that it's not false or defamation then now it's legal record that hate speech has increased since the takeover? This all seems ok with me.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago

    That's not how the American court system works.

    A company like Twitter can bleed the CCDH dry and just walk away with a frivolous lawsuit and a minor (insignificant) penalty.

    And the way that works is not by accident.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Wasn’t he all about free speech and even against censorship?

    “ I think if you go down the censorship route, it’s only a matter of time before censorship is turned upon you.” -musk

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    Musk should sue himself then. Seems like he has done the most to drive away advertisers.

  • source
  • [+] 14 points 3 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    “Free speech for me, not for thee”. God, I’m THIS close to deleting my account there and just migrating back to Tumblr and bluesky. There are just too many users I love that haven’t moved anywhere else yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    He is the forefront of apartheid theory and sees anyone not espousing it a threat to his existence.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (4 children)

    Stop giving Musk free publicity. Don't post or upvote Musk spam.

    Edit Not posting Musk spam on Lemmy does not mean there's no accountability. What Musk wants is for idiots like you to keep upvoting his daily bullshit and doing his marketing for free.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Driving ur attention to here:

    X is a free public service funded largely by advertisers. 

    X aware that the CCDH gained access to X’s data without Brandwatch’s authorization,

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›