Paris votes to crack down on SUVs | Non-Parisians will be charged almost $20 per hour to park large gas or hybrid vehicles within the city center in a bid to address pedestrian safety and air pollu...::Parisians have voted to increase parking charges for out-of-town SUV drivers as part of the city’s efforts to address road safety, air pollution, and climate change.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 87 points 2 years ago (7 children)

World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) study that found SUVs to be 20 percent more polluting and twice as likely to kill a pedestrian in a collision compared to smaller conventional cars.

Twice as likely to kill a pedestrian...if that number holds up this needs to happen in more cities. Driving an excessively deadly vehicle through crowded areas shouldn't be free.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 66 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I think restrictions like these should also include SUV EVs. Safety is the bigger priority than incentivizing a few more EV sales and in the future, there may only be EVs anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Honestly, they should just ban all SUVs from entering altogether.

    Not because of the environment or safety, just because I hate that everything is an SUV these days and they are boring af

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's the carcinization of vehicles, they've all become the same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That would mean lots of people would have to buy a new car, which is much worse for the environment than to keep driving an SUV

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Oversized vehicles are just as destructive to the environment, regardless of whether they are EV or not. In order to move that much mass, they require exponentially more electricity, which results in increased battery size and therefore more mass.

    This isn’t a flaw EVs per se, it is a flaw of obnoxiously obese vehicles.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Well they also exempt taxis and city residents so it’s not about safety or the environment it’s about the money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    All SUV should be banned, but at least city residents pay taxes to the city. Sub urbanites think that they own the city and try to force it's habitats to accept an insecure, congested, and contaminated city because is comfortable for them. If you don't want to live in the city, it's OK, but don't pretend the city have to back forward for you (not talking about you personally, talking about people who lives in suburbs).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not being snarky: if it were about the money, would city residents NOT be exempt?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    No good point, I appreciate discussions!

    I think they know if it didn’t exempt city residents there would be enough backlash from eligible voters it wouldn’t pass. Seeing as it’s a fine and not a ban it can have secondary effects of improving safety and the environment but primarily it will raise money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I'd love it if there were a wide range of offerings for EVs that aren't crossovers/SUVs. Once you take them off the list, it's slim pickings. Doubly so if you want range over 200mi, and doubly so again if you refuse to buy a Tesla.

    "You can try the Mustang Mach-E, that doesn't have much SUV in it."

  • source
  • parent
  • Glad to see an european country taking steps to counteract the trend of larger cars.

  • source
  • [+] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    I hope that this becomes practice throuout Europe and the UK. UK ministers however will say almost anything for short term gain.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    For people not living in Europe to give some context this is what a French SUV looks like compared to a F150.

    Screenshot_20240206-210728_Fennec carsized.com

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    'Paris votes' but 5.6% of parisians made the effort. Laughable

  • source
  • [–] [B] 5 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Parisians have voted to triple parking charges for out-of-town SUV drivers as part of the city’s efforts to address road safety, air pollution, and climate change.

    “Paris is transforming itself to allow people to breathe better and live better.” In a video published to Facebook on November 14th, Hidalgo promoted the referendum by referencing a World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) study that found SUVs to be 20 percent more polluting and twice as likely to kill a pedestrian in a collision compared to smaller conventional cars.

    The vote was closely monitored by other capital cities like London, which face similar challenges in tackling the various safety and pollution issues caused by the growing global popularity of SUV-type vehicles.

    The increase in SUV parking rates is the latest measure Hidalgo has pursued to make Paris more friendly to the environment, pedestrians, and cyclists.

    Paris officials have improved cycling infrastructure and announced plans to set up a traffic-reducing “tranquil zone” to reduce the flow of vehicles into the city center, for example, and successfully banned rental electric scooters last year following a rise in injuries and fatalities among users.

    Hidalgo said last week that the removal of rental scooters had introduced a “feeling of liberation and calm,” which Paris aims to build upon further by reducing the number of SUVs in the city center.


    The original article contains 448 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›