top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 331 points 2 years ago (8 children)

So, instead of getting the ability to search for videos properly, with negative search terms, user defined video length spans, exact dates, sort by reverse date order etc... we get ambient mode and color search? Can someone please, for the sake of humanity and my sanity, erase this company and its parent from the planet.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 171 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Seriously, there was a time when Google was lauded for all kinds of awesome innovation, and joked about that you needed a PhD to even be a janitor there.

    Look at them now. They can't even do basic search functionality anymore, and are so misguided that they put out color filters for video.

    I 100% agree they need to just stop existing at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Arent there like Ralph from the Simpsons originating jokes about how like, this crayon tastes like yellow?

    Congrats YouTube, thank you so much.

    I can now enjoy green flavored content, fuck having a working suggestion algorithm that actually recommends interesting content, I guess I can use YouTube for what it seems to be intended for these days, as an ambient noise and color generator for my monitor and room while i actually do something else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 69 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The fact that Google started as a search company and yet search in their own apps sucks is boggling.

    In YouTube Music, when you're building a tuner to create a station, you can't search at all. Instead, you get an endless scroll off bands and have to find the one you want that way. The order is random.

    Like .. Pandora let you do the same thing with search back in the 00's

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    The fact that Google started as a search company and yet search in their own apps sucks is boggling.

    It's not boggling; it's very simple: they discovered that having shitty search apparently makes them more money than having good search.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 127 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    With all the absurd turns YouTube and Google have taken, I've been looking at this for five minutes trying to figure out if this is a shitpost

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 89 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    It is not, there are actual colour categories at the top of the page which allow you to filter by thumbnails. This is what the Red page looks like for me:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't have the official app, so I choose to pretend this is a shitpost.

    Haha A++ shitpost

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 90 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Sounds like a new and inventive way for them to push sponsored content on you but make it seem like you had some choice in the matter

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    There are millions of youtube videos uploaded every single day. Why do I always get the exact same stuff in my recommendations? And why does YouTube shorts keep playing the same clips over and over again? Even the ones I disliked.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 69 points 2 years ago (26 children)

    I honestly cannot envision a scenario in which I would want something like this from YouTube.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • load more comments (25 replies)
    [–] 65 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If you ever needed proof they dont know what they are doing this is it...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 56 points 2 years ago* (9 children)

    Color is so stupid. Who the fuck cares what color the video is. Couldve used this to actual good like pick three minor subjects from the video and ask me if im interested in more of those. That would be awesome. And I know they have that data.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 48 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The recommendation algo is so bad they are testing it against a random bullshit generator....

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I fucking hate the algorithm.

    I can watch 20 fucking hours of content about a subject, and it wont suggest anything similar.

    but I accidentally click a link someone posts to a crazy right wing video, I get nothing but right wing violence and brainwashing fear mongering videos for over a week that I can barely break the fuck out of with hyper specific searches.

    Which is the same problem facebook has, in that the algorithm favors right wing extremism and shoves people heavily down that path, and only through very significant and concerted effort can you break out of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 48 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    That is stupid. I wish it would just let me block channels for real in search. Also, I wonder how that works if you’re colorblind?

    If I want something news related, that doesn’t mean I want to see Fox News or other random right wing nutjobs who scream into the camera about “wokeism” every day for 4 hours.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Things I wish YouTube would let me do:

    • See dislikes
    • Disable Shorts (uBlock lets me filter them out, at least)
      • At the very least let me control the fucking volume on Shorts instead of muting/unmuting them only if you're going to force them down my throat (seriously, it makes the entire video format unwatchable on Desktop because every fucking Short video is so god damned loud)
    • Disable holding left-click to fast-forward a video (I do this thing where I'm about to pause a video and hold down the click until they're done talking and this change is just so fucking stupid, I don't understand who needs to hold down left click to fast-forward)
    • Actually block channels I'm not interested in
    • Block videos based on keywords
    • Recommend videos based on the one I'm currently watching if my watch history is disabled
      • Seriously, since disabling it YouTube does nothing but recommend "trending" crap that has absolutely nothing to do with what I'm watching

    If they'd implement even half of that, my user experience would shoot up through the roof. But, you know, they couldn't give a rat's ass about user experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Has anyone else noticed that if a video says 'like and subscribe' the subscribe button does a little animation to draw your eye to it?

    Really wish there was a better way to host videos that doesn't require a multibillion dollar company's backing

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    Really wish there was a better way to host videos that doesn’t require a multibillion dollar company’s backing

    Archive.org. For now. But people keep uploading full copyrighted movies to it and there appears to be no content moderation, so at some point there will be a massive lawsuit and it will be shut down. And that will be an incredibly sad day because it is currently also a source of useful public domain footage like the Prelinger Archives. Without the Internet Archive, we will not have a non-commercial archive of public domain footage.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Holy crap, the amount of hate in here, and no actual description of what it does. It's essentially your normal home feed, but only the videos with thumbnails of the selected color. It's also way over at the right of the home feed filters, so it isn't like it's being shoved down your throats.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 34 points 2 years ago

    Probably another method of gathering user data for their AI training models.

    I no longer think that big media corporations are doing stupid things for no reason because they're dumb

    I think they do stupid things because they want another way to train their dumb AI and we're all too dumb, mindless and powerless to say or do anything about it all.

    It's crazy when you think about it ... humanity is degrading itself from all corners just to raise an idiot AI child that will be just as messed up as we are.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Can I get a feed that's not insisting that I watch the same small selection of garbage for months? Thanks.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I just used it and I thought it was kind of cute. It’s obviously “useless”, but as a small (I assume temporary) change I thought it was interesting to see how different “genres” of videos tend to color code themselves in the thumbnail.

    I’m all for small, fun little things in websites. Like anytime google has an interactive daily theme

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

    I like algorithms giving me suggestions in all sorts of ways, but not shady ones. None of the people around me seem to mind, but I worry about a company like Google strongly influencing what information we consume. Even if they didn't use this influence, it's dangerous to have them in the position where they could.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This is a data collection strategy, not a feature

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    That’ll work great. More SEO to pigeonhole videos that will be abused by creators.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    I wonder if they are doing something worse and just overshadowing it with this weird change. Like we are using your data for training AI with no opt out BUT look at this random color picker! Don't mind the first part, LOOK! COLORS!

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Nice to see another intellectual Cracking the Cryptic enjoyer. A toast in your name my friend.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    How revolutionaly. How disruptive. How innovative. /s

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago*

    Wait that's supposed to be for suggesting videos? When I first saw it I thought it was just for customizing the look of the feed and was very disappointed that it changed basically nothing.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    Is this yet another "make something new bs feature to get a promotion" at google?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (8 children)
    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    They should do it on texture instead.

    • Your red velvet cake is missing this one ingredient.
    • Ten Seinfeld quotes about wearing velvet.
    • Your mind will be blown by this analysis of “Blue Velvet”
    • All the Easter eggs in Velvet Underground album covers
    • The terrible origin of the phrase, ‘iron fist in velvet glove’

    All with thumbnails of the narrator with a shocked face & an illustrated arrow pointing at something vague

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›