Sometimes, games serve to build situations that help you understand how some immoral behaviors may become widespread in a given context.

You use CK3, for example: anyone would agree today that ordering your children to marry the prince or princess of the duchy of Wheredafuckisit is immoral, but when doing so could be the difference between having a political ally or not to help you out defend against some warmongering neighbour, it's easy to see that the only rulers that did remain rulers were the ones who didn't hold personal liberty in high regard.

What I mean to say is that a Zoroastrian incest simulator is a great way to provide people with sociological education.

I'm in perfect agreement. But you can't build an animal-fighting game and then try to claim adding guns is immoral.

Me IRL: slavery is evil, we should tax the rich 1000%, all that good stuff.

Me in Kenshi: time to put an entire nation to the torch just because their guy said some bullshit about my race one time. Also, I'll enslave a couple cities along the way; gotta feed/stock my war machine, after all.

Well, slavery is a huge topic in the Conan stories, it is modeled in a rather slavery heavy time period, hence why the gameplay fits so well with the theme. Characters falling into, escaping or being rescued from slavery was a constant trope of those books.

No. The humans are genderless and have shit stats so they aren't worth the 5% catch chance.

I like my merchants close

Asking the real questions here.

You might be interested in Cloud Meadow