all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 1 day ago*

Yet some persistent media coverage of the prime minister’s comments – which were made last month on a podcast that encourages guests to shed any staidness – has elevated the matter to a crisis.

In what sense is it a "crisis"? Right wingers went to the media out of desperation and the media is happily reporting on it because any controversy involving the prime minister, even a completely fake and manufactured one, brings in some revenue for them. No one who matters (i.e. Labor voters) actually cares about this.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    barnaby "fuck my staff" joyce talking about respecting women and trying to take the high ground. . Barnaby "shit my pants and pass out drunk on a bollard" joyce censuring others for embarrassing the office. Fuck me dead. Why are we giving air time to these twats. Even Japan is "we don't give a shit there are more important things"

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    The question can be answered with one word "Murdoch"

    The Murdoch media and their fellow travellers doing what they do best - beat up trivialities.

    Obama and his tan suit was the best one ever though

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Conservatives drove the bar so low, they played their entire hand and nobody gives a shit anymore if someone else does something unsavory. We just say oh well, at least it's not as bad as _________ and you have unlimited choices to fill in the blank.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    Because we have quite a few melon-heads in our media and public life?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    If Tony Abbott said the exact same thing, these people would not complain.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago

    i still think it's abhorent of the PM to mutter those melon comments. And Japan is somehow showing themselves as weak to consider the comment a non-issue.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Because it wasn’t the first time he brazenly sexualized a lady?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I am out of the loop, how did he do this? Evidence if you have it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    This article says he said something about Kylie Minogue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    He didn't "brazenly" sexualise a lady.

    Amid a lighthearted interview released late last week, in which topics included Albanese’s dog and gifts he’d received from world leaders, the host asked Albanese in a “rapid fire” question round to place Kylie Minogue, Nicole Kidman and Rhonda Burchmore in a “shag, marry, date” game.

    Albanese was initially reluctant, responding: “I just got married, I’m only six months in.”

    Osborne replied: “But if it goes tits up, let’s just pretend.”

    Albanese then responded: “Kylie, clearly.”

    Osborne persisted: “You’d marry Kylie, and shag her, and date her?”

    Albanese replied “all of the above”, adding: “She’s terrific.”

    He refused to answer initially and then reluctantly gave a pretty tame answer.

  • source
  • parent