[–] 1 point 6 hours ago

I don't travel overseas often, so yes - I probably would wipe it the next time. Restoring from a backup is pretty quick and easy these days, so I would feel comfortable leaving it in a barebones state until clearing customs and border security.

But I also don't use GrapheneOS, nor would I ever use the duress PIN feature. I expect people using both to take their privacy and security more seriously than me and be willing to take the extra precautions rather than emergency wiping at the last minute when things go wrong. I feel like it's pretty dumb to be an anti-cop political activist in the US at the moment with GrapheneOS on your phone and then not look into or think about any of this stuff beforehand.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

    Interesting, I had wondered if/when we'd get a story like this. It seems kind of crazy to me that this guy chose to wipe it in the airport instead of before traveling, particularly if the US actually has laws that allows it to prosecute him in this scenario.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    We already are, there are support systems (professional and voluntary) that exist to help those who are willing to ask for it. No one can force them to take that first step, though, that's something that is ultimately up to them. It starts with admitting to yourself that you have a problem, which is something these people convincing themselves they are in relationships with chatbots are sadly not doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (3 children)

    Yes, unfortunately Gen Z has gone from being the forgotten generation as children with social media straight into generative AI chatbots as adults. Regulation is too slow and ineffective due to the archaic nature of our institutions. That's part of the reason I feel so strongly about individual responsibility, because unfortunately no one is coming to save these young people (or any of us, really).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

    Most people, I think, would gladly 'wake up' if someone from the outside would shoulder the risk and invest the time and effort into them to get to know them.

    This is the problem, though. The expectation is that someone else is going to come in and save them. If you are a loser with no friends, no one is going to want to be your friend. That's just reality, no one is owed friendship or social interaction.

    If you talk to people who have pulled themselves out of holes (addiction, loneliness, etc) they are usually pretty clear that the first person to blame was themselves and they are willing to accept responsibility for that. This is what gives them the agency to do something about it.

    None of this is to say that the macro solutions should be ignored. It's just the wrong attitude to focus only on these and ignore the micro, which we have direct control over as individuals. We as a broader society have responsibility for solving macro problems, but as individuals we need fo be accountable for our own lives.

    EDIT: By the way, I think your comparison to porn is a good one in terms of the fulfilment of some kind of instinctual human need. Going back to my initial comment, the difference is that people with porn addictions who sit around jorking it all day are still keenly aware that they're not actually having sex.

    The people who think they have a chatbot friend who "understands them like no one else" have completely lost touch with reality, though. This is the bit I find difficult to understand, because at this point I feel like most people should know the basics of how this technology works and understand that what they're saying is happening is impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (11 children)

    It's kind of bizarre to me that AI has been reported about constantly for years and yet so many people are still using it for shit like this. Will they ever wake up and join the rest of us back in reality? They don't have a new friend, they aren't in a relationship, they're not talking to anyone; they are more alone than they've ever been and need an intervention immediately.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    I think it's quite problematic that we already know basically all of the good guy main characters are in zero danger. There are some new characters, but none have a strong enough characterisation to really make me care about what happens to them. They can spend as much money on the big battle set pieces as they want, but without any real stakes these just feel like boring CGI padding to drag the story out and milk the audience for more money. This show has nowhere near enough depth to justify five seasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    I see you haven't found an answer to this yet. Are you sure the "BBG" was in reference to the name of a movie? That the intended meaning wasn't something like "movie with BBG (a person)", "movie at BBG (a place)", etc?

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    I’m sure this is completely unrelated to android’s recent decision to require all app developers to register with google

    The author seems to think so:

    I think a change like this could benefit Google as it goes well along their new Sideloading changes, but I do not actively believe this is what is going on here. There is a true, valid reason behind this, and I think two different approach can be taken. We will talk about it in this blog post.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Same, I thought for sure it wouldn't be renewed/was a standalone series. I guess it must have done quite well. At least the second series seems to have been co-written by the original author, so even though it's not an adaptation of a novel it will hopefully feel consistent with the first.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I felt pretty similarly about Season 2. It was better in some ways, but ultimately I am finding it very difficult to care about a prequel series that feels inevitable in its story beats. Not sure if I will watch Season 3. This is definitely now one of those shows that I'll only watch if I can't find anything else I'm interested in

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    A new poll conducted for The Australia Institute reveals that more than half of Australian voters believe Donald Trump is a greater threat to global security than Russian President Vladimir Putin or Chinese President Xi Jinping.

    The YouGov poll of 1502 people found more than more than twice as many (59%) Australians now believe Australia’s interests are better served by a more independent foreign policy rather than a closer alliance with the United States (23%). Just one in eight (13%) Australians believe the US is a “very reliable” security ally.

    The poll shows a further erosion of confidence in the US under President Trump. A year ago, a similar poll found that 31% of Australians believed Trump was a greater threat to world peace than Putin (27%) and Xi (27%).

    Now, 52% feel that Trump is a bigger threat than Putin (17%) and Xi (16%).

    Key findings:

    • More One Nation voters (35%) believe Trump is a bigger threat to world peace than Putin (18%), and about the same number think Xi is the biggest threat (32%).

    • One third (33%) of Australians now believe the AUKUS security agreement is not in Australia’s best interests.

    • 68% of Australians, including 53% of One Nation voters, oppose Australia’s involvement in the US and Israel’s war on Iran.

    Link to full report.

     

    Beef season two stars Oscar Isaac and Carey Mulligan made an on-set decision that proved rather expensive.

    The Hollywood stars play the leads in new episodes of the hit Netflix show, playing a couple whose marriage starts to disintegrate after their lives collide with a newly engaged pair (Cailee Spaney and Charles Melton).

    During the eight-episode season, there are many scenes of rage and passion, and it’s been revealed that, for certain moments, Isaac and Mulligan listened to music while performing their character beats.

    However, when it came to the edit, these earphones had to be removed and, according to creator Lee Sung Jin, they “cost a fortune to paint out”.

    Speaking on a podcast breaking down the first episode, Sung Jin said: “You two were always playing songs as you performed.”

    Isaac revealed he initially had one for a scene in which he played a Moog synthesizer, but enjoyed the experience so much he thought he might try to listen to songs that matched the scene he was performing. After telling Mulligan about his plan, she asked for one also.

    Potential spoilersThey both wore earwigs for one particular scene in which their characters passionately kiss.

    “That was amazing because it timed out unbelievably well to the moment,” Mulligan said. “The beat would drop on the [kiss]. We were so delighted every time, we were like, ‘It did it again!’”

    Isaac added: “Yeah, the rhythm was lining up. We had to do that because you couldn't have the music playing to cover up the audio, so we liked [wearing the earwigs] so much. We were like, ‘Why don't we keep doing that in other scenes?’ And so we started doing that and it was great.”

    During another scene involving blackmail, the pair were listening to “really chaotic” music by Thom Yorke and Mark Pritchard, which Isaac said “added to the tension”.

    However, one song that didn’t fit with the rhythm was one suggested by Mulligan – Meat Loaf’s 1993 epic “I’d Do Anything for Love (But I Won’t Do That)”.

    “We did so many takes on the blackmail scene that eventually I was like, ‘Let’s do Meat Loaf!’ Halfway through, we were like, ‘No, that doesn't work.’”

     

    The Electoral Commission of South Australia has uncovered more than 600 ballot papers that were not counted in the recent state election, including dozens from the closely contested seat of Narungga on the Yorke Peninsula.

    Narungga has been declared for One Nation's Chantelle Thomas, who won the seat by a margin of just 58 votes.

    The electoral commission has ordered a further count in Narungga since the discovery.

    It says the ballots include 77 unopened absent ordinary ballot papers and four declaration ballot papers that were returned in the neighbouring district of Stuart.

     

    In the same week Hanson refused to apologise for telling Sky News “how can you tell me there are good Muslims?”, 58% of respondents to the Essential poll said they either would vote for One Nation, or were open to voting for them, at the next election due by 2028.

    Among all respondents, 25% said they would “definitely” back the rightwing populist party at the next election, with 33% saying they’re “open” to it. Only 28% said they would “never vote for One Nation”, with 14% unsure.

    February’s Essential poll finds a substantial number of Labor voters are also open to One Nation.

    Among respondents who said they voted for the Coalition, 17% said they would definitely vote One Nation next time, with a startling 51% saying they were open to doing so. Among Labor voters, 12% said they’d definitely vote One Nation, with 33% saying they’d be open to it.

     

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is suing Coles in a lawsuit described as "the case of the century" by a former ACCC boss.

    Yesterday, the ACCC accused Coles of a "planned" campaign to mislead customers with fake or "illusory" discounts on hundreds of common household items from dog food to yoghurt and bottles of Coke.

    The consumer watchdog claims the supermarket giant jacked up prices for a short time before cutting them and including items in the "Down Down" promotion.

    It claims the "Down Down" price was actually more than, or the same as, the regular price.

    In evidence this morning the judge overseeing the case, Justice Michael O'Bryan, asked Coles to explain what it was telling customers with its prominent marketing campaign, featuring giant red hands pointing down.

    "It's really asking a bigger question about what ordinary consumers understand about the Down Down program," Justice O'Bryan said.

    "I don't know if I've seen a statement from Coles which directly answers that question."

    In response, legal counsel for Coles John Sheahan KC said: "In terms of what consumers would take from the advertising campaigns and the red hand — not much."

    "It's an indication that Coles is trying to keep prices low," he said.

    Justice O'Bryan probed further, asking if Coles would accept that "Down Down" was a promotion and showed a discount.

    "Yes," Mr Sheahan responded.

     

    I can see the potential as a less intimidating way to get casual players and friends into the game. The guaranteed shorter game time is also pretty good for when I want to play one more at the end of the night but don't want to endure a possible 45+ minute slogfest.

    However, the complete randomness of the items in a game where certain heroes are not very playstyle flexible and can be hard countered by actives feels pretty stupid at times. I played a game as Vindicta where the enemy got Knockdown in Round 1 and I could barely play the game until Round 3 where I got Unstoppable (which had a way longer cooldown). Item choices are hidden until a round starts, so there is no way to know whether you're going to be hard-countered and need to build unconventionally in response. I feel like they should be able to balance the game mode better but I'm not sure how serious they're taking it right now.

     

    In short:

    The American Broadcasting Company has axed Jimmy Kimmel Live! for comments the host made referencing the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.

    The Australian Broadcasting Corporation has received hundreds of complaints intended for America's ABC about the show being cancelled.

    The vast majority of complaints sent to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation contained expressions of dismay, with many citing concerns about free speech and the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

    lol

    view more: next ›