top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 304 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Now this is the kind of growth factor the Fediverse needs, not Threads.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 139 points 3 years ago (7 children)
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Probably because the need of moderation.

    If you host an instance and let people in (even if it’s a limited circle, i.E. your students) you are responsible for moderation. I think that’s something institutions back off currently.

    For an mail server that’s much easier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 36 points 3 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    Many Universities already have their own dedicated subreddits that are usually moderated by a mix of faculty, staff, and students. I know of at least one sub moderated in part by the chair oftheh math department, who is as funny as they are savage.

    An above-average level of shitposting goes on, sure, but it's also a great venue for the school's online community to engage across organizational boundaries.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 198 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I know I’m not the only one who has been saying that this type of move makes perfect sense for governments and news organizations, but I’m going to go ahead and take credit for this.

    You’re welcome, guys!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 98 points 3 years ago

    This makes so much sense.

    BBC wouldn't make their news site under Google Blogger... so why depend on other corporations for your microblogging?

    Spin up your own server, have your own verification, then use it on your site and share outs.

  • source
  • [–] 90 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I'm a fan of the BBC, they make a lot of terrific programmes and the breadth of the audience their radio stations cater to is pretty phenomenal.

    They also have a history of experimenting with technology so it's not a total surprise they've taken this step. Since most people on Mastodon are either sharing British news sources from the BBC or The Guardian anyway it will be interesting to see how they fare...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 70 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I may be misremembering but seem to recall them being early to Tw*tter too. Good sign

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    my guy you don't have to censor the word twitter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 57 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 36 points 3 years ago (21 children)

    ...and already blocked by at least one instance, mastodon.art.

    https://mastodon.art/@Curator/110809888584495290

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    While I don't think it's necessarily sufficient to justify defederating their whole instance, it's worth noting that the reason they gave is definitely accurate. The BBC is incredibly transphobic. Here's a Wikipedia article about one of their worst, most prominent instances. It's no more so than is pretty standard in Britain these days, sadly, but that's not a good bar to measure yourself against.

    There was a big campaign of utilising the BBC's complaints process to complain about the many flaws in that article. Here's a YouTube video by one person involved in that campaign. That's part 1 of 4 as the different stages of the process played out. The TL;DW is that the BBC ended up ignoring the complaints and ended up picking up on small flaws in the way the complaint was phrased (or just making up flaws where they didn't really exist) to use as an excuse to "respond" saying there was no problem with their journalistic standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    When I see this shit I lose all hope in the Fediverse's success

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I think it's just the one server run by a mentalcase tbh. Not the first time I've seen them mentioned. The other thing was them freaking out because of GIMP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It’s honestly great to have the people who like to complain about things separated from the things they complain about. It sets for a more positive vibe in general, and probably does wonders for their blood pressure as well.

    I think anyone who disagrees with this decision would have left that instance a long time ago anyway :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 34 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This could really get the ball rolling

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    The Dutch Government also launched an instance not that long ago. It's a pity it took so long, but Musk's antics are finally forcing people to move.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 27 points 3 years ago

    This is great! The Dutch government made their own official instance (social.overheid.nl) too!

  • source
  • [+] 24 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)
    load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago

    It's a smart thing for news sources and ngos to do - run an instance and use it to issue posts and provide a platform for journalists. Twitter and other platforms can still receive posts but the "source of truth" is the Mastodon server

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Didn’t know they have their own TLD

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That is fucking awesome.

    I love the BBC, I hate seeing what it's been forced to turn into by threats from a succession of Conservative governments. I still pay my TV license despite pirating all my TV and movie content for years.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    How can one add social.bbc to my Lemmy subscribed list?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    You cannot follow the entire instance as such, rather the individual accounts on the instance - such as @BBCRD, @BBC_News_Labs, @Connected_Studio etc.

    Kbin users can subscribe to whatever content is shared from social.bbc on federated instances by subscribing to /d/social.bbc, but I'm not sure how much sense that makes. :)

    Edit: In Lemmy you'd find the users by entering for example /u/BBCRD@social.bbc, but as @roguetrick pointed out Lemmy is not really made for microblogging.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    I love this. No more “blue checkmarks” or paid verification processes. Just check the domain of the post(s) to confirm they are legit.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›