Edit: obligatory explanation (thanks mods for squaring me away)...

What you see via the UI isn't "all that exists". Unlike Reddit, where everything is a black box, there are a lot more eyeballs who can see "under the hood". Any instance admin, proper or rogue, gets a ton of information that users won't normally see. The attached example demonstrates that while users will only see upvote/downvote tallies, admins can see who actually performed those actions.

Edit: To clarify, not just YOUR instance admin gets this info. This is ANY instance admin across the Fediverse.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 166 points 3 years ago* (7 children)

To anyone surprised at this: welcome to the fediverse, please treat everyhing you do or say as public.

The way to achieve privacy around here is by following the long forgotten arts of the old internet before Facebook was a thing: use a Nick name and don't tell strangers on the internet your real identity.

Your home instance will act as a proxy and only they have access to your email and IP address. That does stay private.

So, as long as you trust your home instance to not leak or disclose your connection or sign up data (which would be illegal in EU countries), just sign up with an alias.

A very positive aspects of this is that it should allow us to detect voting manipulation by correlating the activity of certain potentially malicious actors. If Lemmy instances take vote manipulation seriously and do their best to block bots this has the chance to make Lemmy / Kbin much more transparent and credible than Reddit ever was.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

    Lol. kids these days would post their bank info online if the banks didn't prevent them from doing so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    You say that like A/S/L wasn't a thing back in the day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    19/f/Cali was the only acceptable response

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I don't want to shame anyone, but I've had people sign up give me their full DoB and offering to show me their ID. I know of people who disclose their id to get access to nsfw discord communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    DUDE MY GIRLFRIEND FUCKING DID THAT AND I JUST LOOKED AT HER AND ASKED HER IF SHE THOUGHT THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA. In hindsight no, thankfully she's gonna be moving soonish. This was from before we were together, otherwise I would have warned her not to do that. It was the same discord she got a cyberstalker from, thankfully the stalker wasn't a friend of the owner because otherwise he totally could have gotten her address and irl info.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I whole heartedly agree with this perspective.

    Additionally, and this is an unpopular opinion, but trying to maintain a Nick or online identity over many years is folly. You end up with a huge repository of personal information, increasing the risk that it can be connected to you personally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 64 points 3 years ago* (13 children)

    To illustrate op's point I'm going to spin up an instance, federate with everyone, and not tell anyone what that instance is.

    Then I'm going to feed all that data into my new website, called Open Lemmy Stats, where anyone can query the user data ive accumulated. The homepage will be ripe with insights, leaderboards and all kinds of data on prolific users.

    Additionally, I'll display a snapshot/profile of a random user by feeding that users data to GPT4 to make inferences about the user's political affiliations and display the results.

    Worst of all, I'm not going to out my instance for everyone to know it as the one to defederate. In fact I'm spinning up a few instances that will host innocuous communities that I plan to mod and support to give my instances cover for their true purpose: redundant fediverse datastreams for my site, Open Lemmy Stats.

    I'll also have a store where anyone can buy my collected fediverse data for a handsome sum.

    Just kidding I'm not doing any of this. But someone absolutely will or already is.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    You know, I came in here with the mindset that the topic of discussion here isn't a bad thing; I'm largely pro information-should-be-open-and-available. But you've argued a very solid point, and I've changed my mind on the issue. I appreciate you sharing this perspective!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    I think your comment clearly illustrates what might go wrong with it. If they need this data for sorting or something else absolutely, then I would be happy if they just hashed the usernames/instances or used some other form of UID.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 46 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    Edit: Obligatory RIP my inbox.

    Can we leave this kinda stuff behind? It is NOT obligatory.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Redditisms are cringe and always have been. Yes I agree we should leave them behind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    Reading these comments, seeing so many excuses, sarcastic responses, and handwaving, makes me realize a great deal of users really need to develop some imagination.

    This is not about privacy. It's about data that can easily be used for targeting and profiling users, and how that creates countless avenues for targeted harassment and wide scale retaliation. It's about all of the innumerable ways public vote information can and will be abused to manipulate scoring across the site with targeted/automated shadow banning and shared blocklists. Raise your hand if you trust every single admin to never abuse such a tool to curate the outward appearance of an instance to fit a narrative.

    For a different example: I could say something about how great Nazis are right now, and have a bot programmed to read every single person that downvoted me, add those names to a shared blocklist, and viola, I've made myself and all my alts invisible to the people that would challenge me on a massive scale.

    I promise you this is going to be a big issue as tools for this site get more sophisticated over time.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    alternatively, if votes were private, you could spin up a bot network to mass upvote your comment; making it far more influential as most people are more inclined to believe statements they think others also feel. thankfully, votes are open, so you can't

    as long as there is a system, people will try to game the system; and when there is a new system, people will come up with new games

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago

    Oh no, so my upvotes on c/spacedicks aren't private?

    /s

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Not to sound harsh or anything, but those of you saying that it's okay that all this data is public are insane. This completely goes against the entire philosophy of the Fediverse and FOSS in general. The reason we all are fleeing from Big Tech is because they collect so much data on us. At least, they keep it hidden from public view. This is a major issue in my opinion, and needs to be addressed ASAP before we can claim to have superior platforms on the Fediverse. Why can't this data at least be encrypted?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago*

    Agreed, I am incredibly confused by what seems to be the majority reaction to this.

    I've never been particularly involved with the FOSS community, though I do use a few FOSS apps and generally appreciate their view on what FOSS means. I also strongly appreciate data privacy, and it was my observation that the FOSS community was (generally) relatively the same way. So to see this reaction is very surprising. It's quite literally the same terrible argument of "Why fear it if you have nothing to hide" used against multiple data privacy concerns throughout the years.

    I think the worst are the bad faith "But Reddit...!" arguments. For one, we're not on Reddit anymore, this is about Lemmy's issues that can be corrected. And for two, whilst Reddit potentially outsourcing that data to the highest bidder is far from ideal, at the very least the data wasn't outright PUBLIC to anyone who wishes to set up a simple server.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I’ll just use my short username then

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Just commenting so this stays one of the most commented posts. Feel free to keep scrolling

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    I downvoted the beans and I don't care who knows about it. I'd do it again.

    This is useful to know though, thanks. I guess assume everything is public short of your password (unless your admin is particularly nefarious and has altered the code to store passwords in plaintext for some reason).

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    Well of course. The instance stores all data in a postgres database. How else will it be able to remember anything?

    Maybe this is not obvious to non-programmers but you never see everything in the user interface for any system. There are tons of records needed for the system to track everything that goes on.

    Since posts are federated, they will exist in the local db as well as on each instance.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    There's something amusing about people feeling violated by their activity being made public, but not necessarily by corporations hoarding and capitalizing on that activity & data. I mean, one of them is out in the open. The other is pure abuse.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    Suppose there is someone who wants to maintain their anonymity and privacy on Lemmy so that it couldn't be tied to their real identity, what do you think is the best way to do that?

    Hmm, I, famous Hollywood actress Margot Robbie and star of "Barbie", sure am stumped.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›