Greetings lemmings

I can't seem to find a verdict on the use of syncthing fork these days.

I know there was turmoil around the repo owner changing hands, and the lack of communication around it.

Looking to see what folks are using these days for Syncthing on android.

Any and all info on this welcomed!

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

I just started using BasicSync and I like how it's basically just the regular webUI

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I still use Syncthing-Fork. It also is available in F-Droid. There are some other apps like BasicSync or SyncUp in F-Droid. Maybe you can try those.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Mostly out of the loop, I use this fork as well. Apps distributed on the F-Droid repo are OSS, built from source, and screened for malware.

    If the fork is no longer maintained I expect it to be removed from the repo, that should be announced on the blog with the regular app news.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago

    Syncthig Fork is fine.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I've raised this question a little while ago: https://lemmy.ml/post/47046615

    My personal conclusion was to use BasicSync. It's a minimal wrapper around the upstream shared codebase of syncthing itself, and it's so far been very stable and reliable. Security-wise and in terms of risks of abandonment, this approach also makes sense for me. I use it since.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The new owner had posted in the Syncthing forum and has catfriend1. I'm comfortable using the fork.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Hey glad to hear there are people comfortable using it and aren't still sketched out. As the communication to the change was rather alarming. And since then I had not used it, as I am one of those folks that appreciate transparency. It does build trust.

    Had it been handled differently, such as Catfriend1 putting out a statement leading up to it; I would have been much less apprehensive. Granted it was catfriend1's project, and they are free to do what they see fit with their project; but it does burn trust with the folks using it if handled such as the way it was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago

    syncthing fork ran just fine always enabled. Basicsync seems to suck down my battery like crazy

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    someone posted about https://f-droid.org/packages/com.chiller3.basicsync/ during the "turmoil around the repo owner changing hands, and the lack of communication around it" and i've been using it ever since.

    it is lighter and it works as well

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Thank you, I will absolutely be checking this out. Luckily F-Droid is compatible with Obtainium; though I will likely see if I can find the repo for it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    I use the version before the change. There's some easy instructions to run it as a Linux package (? Sorry not sure of the terminology) as android can do that. The only issue is you dont have a direct GUI and need to use the web interface. I believe its much smaller and more efficient than any app, not to mention uses the "official" version.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I use Syncthing-Fork and it works great for me. The only problem I have is the "Run for 5 minutes" tile.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I am considering it. But wasn't sure if there was fear in the changing of hands to this new guy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments