“The fact that we crossed over to negative cash flow was kind of a negative milestone, and people are reacting to that,” Gil Luria, head of technology research at D.A. Davidson, told Fortune. “Maybe there was a sense that we’d never get to that point, and we just did.”

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 1 day ago (1 child)

Nobody is forcing Big Tech to do AI. Nobody even wants Big Tech to do AI at the token cost required to make AI even mildly profitable.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Honestly though, if the investor class is what finally pops the AI bubble by simply diversifying away from the big tech LLM circle jerk, I’ll take the win. If FAANG et al loses the monopolistic control they have in so many areas, that’s a HUGE success.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Wall Street hates it? Tech companies have been doing this for years, yet Wall Street keeps giving them more money.

    If they hate it they have a strange way of showing it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Big tech historically makes huge gains, AI is the first thing big texh has done that’s not giving huge returns

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Didn't Amazon do exactly that for a decade?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    It's also called digging a hole. Then comes trying to dig yourself out. Then collapse

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    They will remember the first rule of getting out of a hole, right?

    Right?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments