all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 77 points 1 day ago (2 children)

bad day to have chosen this username ig :(

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (1 child)
  • [–] 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Please read the sidebar rules before posting. Posts to this Lemmy community must be exclusively represented in 3 dimensional space.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Technically speaking, all images are 2d projections

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

    And this is a 2d projection of a 3d projection of a basic 4d shape that we literally cannot comprehend

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    We've never seen anything 2 dimensional. Everything we can see has some form of all 3 dimensions in it. Even shadows are 3 dimensional. We conceptualize them as 2 dimensional on a wall, but they have depth. (Think of how when you see a line it's actually 2 dimensional due to the width of the line, then apply that concept to depth as well)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    A shadow is not the same as a line drawn by a pencil. And a 2d line can be for example the contrast of two colours, the "line" that delimits an object from your perspective - these are no drawn lines with any width, they are not there as full 3d objects. I would think a shadow is a similar case, just as a film projection. It has no thickness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Well shadows are the absence of light, so defining them is a little weird, but they exist the entire distance from where the light source is interrupted to where they are projected on, same with projections, it's not just what's on the screen, but the light the whole way to the screen.

    Even ignoring that, the surface that a projection lands on has texture and depth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Two dimensional projections can be represented in three dimensional space. Even single dimensional entities are welcome here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago*

    If you look at a sheet of paper on edge, you can see a poor man's representation of one dimension, while hiding an additional dimension, made in the only way you can actually have a thing to hold with yet one more

    Edit: make guillotines great again, or whatever the tesseract deems uncouth

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    But tesseract is in 3-dimensional space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago

    A tesseract is a 3 dimensional representation of a 4 dimensional body. The fact that a tesseract has to be animated to show all of its 4 dimensional vertices in 3 dimension is an act of shaming 3 dimensional space for being "less than". Frankly, I don't stand for this type of body shaming.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    That's just overkill you could just post square with 0.5° corner misalignment

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago

    I should call her.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    I'm out of the loop on this one

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments