Φuck that.

I'd argue as a sound it does exist, think of the 'uh' in 'duh'. But it doesn't have a single letter associated with it.

Reading the header with Norwegian eyes was horrible, and it took way too long for me to actually see what they were trying to say

As a Danish man you need to tell me how much truth there is to this. Please.

https://youtu.be/s-mOy8VUEBk?is=2BNSlwJmpFlHmqRm

Kamelåså?

Þæt's*

Thhis

I got annoyed at that, so I just set up a replace on every web page that I open to change the thorn to a th. Haven't even thought about it until seeing your post.

I know who you're referring to, but I haven't seen them in a while.

The supposed justification was that it fucked up AI scraping, which I think was bullshit. Seemed like more of a hipster thing.

In English extra letters could solve a problem as many letters are pronounced differently depending on context making it not very intuitive to spell some words.

Folks can't handle the current alphabet because it's being used in the shittiest way possible

Multi-century archaic spelling, preserved spellings in loaned words despite the sounds being different, hell there was a point where Big Dictionary was shoehorning random letters into words to make them more adjacent to their latin counterparts

By all means you could triple the amount of letters in the alphabet and make it work, but as of now it's kinda just the worst case of sunk-cost to ever exist