Pritt was initially elected to the state House as a Democrat in 2022 but changed his political affiliation to Republican the year after. Republican Party chair Elgine McArdle said in a statement that Pritt had realized that the “Democratic Party of today is not the Democratic Party that our parents grew up with.”

State Republicans have filed numerous bills seeking to restrict gender-affirming care for transgender minors, ban trans student-athletes from playing on sports teams that match their gender identity, and nullify cities’ non-discrimination ordinances.

In 2023, Pritt voted for a ban on gender-affirming care for trans youth. State Sen. Mike Azinger (R) said that the bill was needed because gender is “self-evident” and that the bill was needed to stop doctors who want to “chop up a child,” even though gender affirming surgery is almost never performed on minors and the bill banned non-surgical interventions.

Why is it always the ones you most suspect?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [M] 9 points 2 days ago (1 child)

FYI - A lot of the discussion here about the headline is now irrelevant that the source saw the light and corrected it:

"GOP lawmaker arrested after allegedly sexually abusing a middle schooler in a classroom"

OP - If you can update your headline to match, that would be great!

And, yes "having sex" in this context, is rape apology.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    I'd gladly do so if you add an expressed permission in the rules to guaruntee that some other mod in the future doesn't bjtch about making that sort of change (especially if this happens again to another article down the road). Add text to rule 1. Like add a rule 1a that says something like:

    The original poster may update their Lemmy post's titles to match an updated article title ONLY IF the origional source has updated the article's title subsequent to the original posting on Lemmy.

    Make that change, and I'll happily update it. I just want to shield myself and future posters from arbitrary and capricious moderators.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [M] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    We require submissions match the source headline.

    The title in the original source changed, it's on you to make sure your title stays updated.

    If you're in reading comments, you can double check and fix the title at the same time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    The title in the original source changed, it’s on you to make sure your title stays updated.

    If you’re in reading comments, you can double check and fix the title at the same time.

    Is that explicit in the rules? My point is that, while YOU or the current mod team in this exact moment might allow for the change in this specific instance, it would be helpful to memorialize that if/when this happens again in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [M] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    It IS explicit in the rules, first rule in fact:

    "Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    I followed the rules exactly. The title of my post was an exact match for the article at the time of posting. After reader complaints, the news source decided to change it after the post on Lemmy was made. My point is that it would be helpful to have an adendum (that 1a bit above) that shields people for when that happens. Like, what if they change the title, it gets updated on Lemmy, then it changes again?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [M] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    At the time of posting, and after a bunch of complaints I'm sure, based on the discussion here ALONE, the original source editorially corrected the headline.

    You should have the common sense to do the same, if you don't, I can just remove the post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    I'm not arguing about removing or not removing the post. Hell, I am not arguing about wether to change the title. I already changed it. I am raising the concern about future instances. This has the potential for repeatability, and mods cycle in and out. That makes the instant title change concern or statement from you (one mod) an inherently subjective application

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [M] 1 point 22 hours ago (1 child)

    It's always tricky, but thanks for updating it!

    The real problem are the "live" stories that update the headline every time you turn around.

    The only solution is to watch it continually and update where applicable,

    But I never outright remove something without giving the OP a heads up and a reasonable amount of time to fix it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 3 days ago (9 children)

    "having sex with"

    Nope, he raped a child.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 176 points 4 days ago (46 children)

    “Having sex”? There’s no “having ses” with a middle schooler. Its rape. He allegedly raped a child in a classroom.

    Why do reporters nearly always defend these men with their word choices?

  • source
  • hideshow 48 child comments
  • load more comments (44 replies)
    [–] 116 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    I just sent this to their contact us page.

    This article https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/07/gop-lawmaker-arrested-after-allegedly-having-with-middle-schooler-in-a-classroom/ Titled as "allegedly having sex with middle schooler" is trash rape culture wording. You cannot "have sex" with a child. That is rape. Period, Your readers expect better than to white wash crimes against children like this. Statutory rape is rape. Sex with a child is rape. There is no consent, and thus, no obligation for you to sugar coat article wording like this. Please do better.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 days ago

    That’s called rape and pedophilia. Coward ass journalists today.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    PEDO PARTY

    If Dems were good at messaging, which they aren't, they'd blast this everywhere imaginable to make the name really stick.

    If Republicans can make the public believe Haitian immigrants were cooking and eating people's pets then Dems can make people believe something that's pretty obvious at this point.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 3 days ago

    "Democratic Party of today is not the Democratic Party that our parents grew up with.”

    Joins the Republican party and rapes kids.

  • source
  • [–] 73 points 4 days ago

    raping* you cannot have consensual sex with a 13yo.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 days ago

    “While every person is entitled to the presumption of innocence and due process under the law, charges involving the exploitation and abuse of children strike at the core of the public trust,” Holstein said. “The people of his district deserve representation that is beyond reproach, and these allegations make it impossible for him to effectively serve.”

    Yes, he should resign from office for the good of the party. It's very hard to bury this kind of thing while the rapist is still in office.

    Also, yet another one for the pile:

    Republican Sexual Predators, Abusers, and Enablers Pt. 61 - 1500 and counting.

  • source
  • [–] 54 points 4 days ago

    Oh would you look at that? Once again it's not a trans person, gay person or a drag queen.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 3 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 33 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Republican Party chair Elgine McArdle said in a statement that Pritt had realized that the [Republicans more aligned with his personal interests]

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    Why is every conservative a pedophile?

    I remember the conservative men I knew in childhood, and they were all woke by modern standards. Some beat their wives bloody, one spent a friend's college fund on sex workers (jokes on him; last I heard she was the best in the business and the rest of us got student debt), several were known rapists, my aunts talked about office parties being 'dangerous', and marital rape was just kind of an assumption.

    But so few of them were pedophiles. Like I completely avoided being raped as a child. What happened? Was I just an unfuckable kid? Were all my friends whose families weren't religious just unfuckable kids?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    They forget the part where you need to be filthy rich to get away with this.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 3 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Not from the US, so checked and 8th Grade is 13-14 years old. This is statutory rape here in the UK, and hopefully in the US also.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    Is being a pedo mandatory to join GOP?

  • source
  • [+] 21 points 4 days ago*
    load more comments
    view more: next ›