top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 158 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Ye nah, absolutely fuck the meet industry.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 3 days ago
    [–] 21 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    At least give the animals a nice time until slaughter. Stress fucks up the meat.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 77 points 5 days ago (98 children)

    As much as I find chickens, and all avians in general, cute and I find it sickening the way they are treated... I do love eggs, they're tasty, versatile, easy to cook, and unbelievably healthy.

    I think the differential we have to identify is one thing, and that is scale.

    I am not a vegan, I do not believe it is wrong to consume animals or animal-sourced products, however I do support animal welfare and believe that if we are to raise livestock for consumption they should be treated as the sentient, thinking, feeling creatures that they are and cared for accordingly.

    Imagine instead of human and animal rights we just had "sentient rights", for example.

    Being able to test for sentience is a topic in and of itself, and out of scope for my argument.

    I think there is no harm done in, a hypothetical world where people had the space to do such a thing, raising our own livestock, limited to individual homesteads or the immediate settlement (a local town market, for example).

    The line where it becomes unethical is quite obvious really, are the animals treated as living things, or machines to simply fuel and feed to grow them for slaughter and harvest? Yes, in my example of fair treatment the goal may be to raise them for eventual slaughter, but its their lifelong treatment where this applies, not the overall objective.

  • source
  • hideshow 99 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    The better treatment balloons costs by requiring more land and more care, which significantly inflates the cost of the final products. This could be an effective measure for reducing meat consumption by people buying less to save money, many people would be against those increases.

    Its just like mass produced clothing. Since they dont see the abuse and destruction, they are satisfied with the lower prices at the store.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Again, scale.

    How much of the meat produced is actually eaten? What’s the chance for each garment produced to actually be worn more than once?

    The current system can downsize significantly without needing to raise prices, as we’re already in a significant surplus.

    The point at which products are no longer guaranteed due to demand is when the prices have to go up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (97 replies)
    [–] 34 points 5 days ago (14 children)

    I hope when I die my corpse is cut up, fried in my own body fat, and fed to pigs.

    Fuck factory farms, things dont have to be this way. For this and many other wrongs in our world.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 1 point 2 days ago
    [–] 19 points 4 days ago

    What the fuck. We can do without factory farming!

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    I disagree. They are very likely the worst of the industries in seeing here. Not even in just one way either.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 25 points 5 days ago (35 children)

    long-time vegan here, this argument is as old as time.

    is it ethical to kill? no.

    do humans need meat to survive? no.

    is animal agriculture equivalent to slavery? yes.

    if you eat meat, deep down inside you know you're supporting: murder, rape, entrapment, torture, and slavery. that includes eggs and milk.

    bonus fun fact: pigs are smarter than dogs

  • source
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • load more comments (35 replies)
    [–] 17 points 4 days ago (12 children)

    Caplyta is an anti-psychotic.

    Do you really want to take that from me?!?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 7 points 4 days ago*

    Comment section makes me doubt the very obvious-seeming criticism here

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 days ago

    Just let the pig live on a nice farm omg.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 5 days ago* (5 children)

    Don't give industrialized ag a pass. i get why you did, but you can get bacon without Oscar mayer.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 24 points 5 days ago (6 children)
    load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 7 points 4 days ago

    I'd give up the bacon and the server farms for affordable consumer grade hardware and tobacco.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 5 days ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 18 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    Fuck corporations. I buy my pigs from a local farmer and kill them myself. My coworkers complain but I tell them it's much better when it's fresh.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›