all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 93 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Note that the law passed automatically because at least 361 MEPs did not vote against it, regardless of how many voted for it.

Yes this is a real thing in the EU, you can just pass laws on a minority if they really want them.

Straight out of the US/fascist playbook.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    You need to clarify, the record show majority in favour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    The vote was framed as stopping the automated renewal of an existing law.

    So in favour means "in favour of not having mass surveillance"

    My guess (which I admittedly haven't checked) is that that's also why a simple majority wasn't enough (because they essentially would have been overturning law)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    This is just gutting to hear about. I'm so incredibly disappointed. I genuinely, and naively as it turns out, thought the EU "leadership" was better than this. :(

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    People voted in a bunch of right wing nutters, so there you are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago*

    I checked my own country's MEP voting record and this shit was entirely done by the mainstream parties - even the far-right (to my surprise) tried to stop it.

    If you think about it, it makes sense that those entrenched in power are the ones more interested in mass surveilance and other forms or early detection of dissent, and in most of Europe the far-right are not in power, they're the challengers and it's the mainstream parties (generally two of them, thanks to anti-Democratic non-PV voting systems) which alternate in power.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    What changes with the return of Chat Control 1.0—and what stays the same:

    • What is coming back: US tech companies are once again allowed to scan private messages without a warrant or prior suspicion. This affects direct messages on platforms like Instagram, Discord, Snapchat, Skype, and Xbox, as well as emails via Google’s Gmail and Apple’s iCloud.
    • What remains unchanged: Public social media posts and files hosted in cloud storage could already be scanned without this law. Furthermore, private messages can always be reported by users, or monitored by authorities using targeted, court-ordered wiretapping.
    • What is still NOT being scanned: End-to-end encrypted chats, such as those on WhatsApp, have always been exempt from these scans. Additionally, European providers of messaging and email services have never implemented chat control measures.
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Huh? What is this for when e2ee is being exempt? Is it actually privacy measure in style "You will be tracked unless you use encryption"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    It's a stepping stone towards more surveillance, just like every other bill that lead us here. Small enough that the populus won't riot, large enough that's it's a tangible blow to privacy and democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Howtheyvote show the reverse in the voting record. 314 in favour

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Oh for fucks sake!

    So, what are some good encrypted alternatives to common messaging apps? Signal instead of WhatsApp/Messenger etc? Proton mail/drive/etc instead of Google? Any other suggestions? Would a mobile vpn help?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Just go offline, I am so sick of everything being an opportunity for privacy invasions and money extraction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Signal instead of WhatsApp is generally a good idea, but WA is not covered by this law as they are end to end encrypting all messages. Switching to Proton Mail would help, using a VPN (most likely) would not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • I can't understand why anybody would trust WhatsApp. It's development and infrastructure are paid for by one of the last companies you want to trust with your private data, and they even run expensive ad spots for it. Why would they do that? Facebook is not altruistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Are you sure it’s all messages? I thought WA group chats are not encrypted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Why are the votes flipped in the article?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago