top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 81 points 3 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 59 points 3 years ago* (6 children)

    09.08.2023 (dd/mm/yyyy) anybody?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 56 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    DD/MM/YYYY is the best in my opinion

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I agree with this because if you were to say the whole thing verbally, you generally start with the day, the month then the year.

    "It is the 9th of August in the year of our Lord 2023."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    We wouldn't in America in most cases. I'd say it's August 9th 2023. I honestly feel like this is such a dumb argument to have because it doesn't matter except for communication with people who use other methods. Now metric vs imperial makes way more sense to me because the metric system is just so much easier for mathematical conversions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    In metric, one milliliter of water occupies one cubic centimeter, weighs one gram, and requires one calorie of energy to heat up by one degree centigrade—which is 1 percent of the difference between its freezing point and its boiling point. An amount of hydrogen weighing the same amount has exactly one mole of atoms in it. Whereas in the American system, the answer to ‘How much energy does it take to boil a room-temperature gallon of water?’ is ‘Go fuck yourself,’ because you can’t directly relate any of those quantities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 53 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    ISO 8601 or nothing. Descending order of granularity, keep everything sorted as it should be!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    RFC 3339, because ISO is not free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 46 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Aug 9, 2023 and 08/09/23 literally say the same thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    They do but one informs the reader of the order of the format while the other doesn’t.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 41 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Can’t believe relevant xkcd hasn’t been posted.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Last two are both dumb, YYYY-MM-DD or DD-MM-YYYY or go home

    Yes I'm American

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The last two are the same thing though

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I swear, a lot of you would have no joy in life if you weren't able to bitch about the stupidest shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 17 points 3 years ago

    Reddit ass post

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    09/08/2023 (I'm an American who doesn't care what everyone in my country uses if that "custom" is nonsense...)

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    Unix time is the best format

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    Date stamps are stupid, but they're nowhere near as stupid as this attempt to criticize them

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    13/AUG/2023

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›