A definitive answer is impossible unless God makes itself known. There is no evidence for god and thus no scientific answer. God is a belief, belief is not scientific.

I recommend a web search for the "god of the gaps" fallacy. You have discovered a 300+ year old concept.

Since you’re asking science: The scientific method needs to be used to prove, not disprove, the existence of things.

what actual real evidence exists for a god?

the bible doesnt count as evidence.

Which one do you mean?

Using science to explain God is like using breakdancing to explain engineering.

You need to define what you mean by "god" first. Which god? What are its qualities? What are its falsification criteria?

You can't just say, "What does science have to say," because it's not a singular question about a singular being.

Science has not provided a definitive answer that im not god.

Youve awoken the smug reddit atheists

There is one interesting connection that I have found.

In 1999, researchers in New York fired very powerful lasers at each other. When they intersected, they caused an electron and a positron to spring out of the vacuum.

If light can cause the creation of matter, then there's the possibility, however slim, that a hermit sitting on a hill blazed out of his gourd on some divine bush could have been given some sort of insight that perhaps he was linguistically incapable of accurately communicating.

I'm not saying that this definitively proves anything. I just find it interesting that a hermit on a hill 7,000 years ago could have somehow deduced in any way that light was one of the fundamental particles of the universe, or that matter could be made from light.

...what started off as a legitimate question has now become an extremely interesting (and amusing) social experiment. Keep the nonsensical, non-scientific answers coming, folks.