top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 156 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Every now and then, there's an article about some dumb shit a person on The View says. My reaction is always surprise that The View is still even a thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don't really understand who their target audience is. They would've been conservative 20 years ago, but today I think they just cater to saying whatever middleclass boomers want to hear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    A combination of that and knowing that comments like that will get articles like this, garnering them more attention and views. Ragebait may have become a recent Big Problem in the algorithms of social media, but it's been around forever. Howard Stern and Jerry Springer built their fortunes on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 121 points 2 years ago

    Just get a job? Why don’t I strap on my job helmet and squeeze down into a job cannon and fire off into Jobland, where jobs grow on jobbies!

  • source
  • [–] 97 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Boomer with 30 million dollars earned by having uneducated conversations with uneducated women to entertain uneducated women tells young people to just "get a job".

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 93 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I am a fucking insurance professional- educated and licensed -and I still can't make ends meet and pay off my student loans.

    Tax the rich and enhance social programs. It's not about the job, it's about luck and generational wealth hoarding.

  • source
  • [–] 78 points 2 years ago

    Not all of us can get a job as a loudmouth caricature from 4chan.

  • source
  • [–] 76 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Many people would be surprised how many homeless people have (hard science) degrees or used to be very succesful. Bad luck, medical debt, (mental-)health issues, company goes bankrupt due to circumstances beyond your control, etc.

    The world isn't fair. You can work really hard, and end up in the oven of a concentration camp, despite what the slogan above the gate said.

    Of course, if you're a relatively talentless hack who's won the equivalent of the lottery despite not really deserving it that much, it's nicer to think that you deserve it because of your inate talent. Vanity. It's the Devil's favourite sin.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Medical debt is so underappreciated and it is no joke. It can add up very, very high and very, very quickly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Also without any warning or planning -- could be cancer, could be a freak accident. You never know if/when a medical emergency might happen, so you're always in an odd state of financial limbo even though it may not appear that way. You could be doing just fine squirreling away a few hundred or thousand here and there and one trip to the ER will quickly take back most of that nest egg. Even with insurance, it's absurd how much you can still be on the hook for. What's the alternative though, forgo medical treatment?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 70 points 2 years ago

    "Wealthy asshole has no empathy." I'm shocked. Fuck her. Fuck talking heads in general.

  • source
  • [–] 62 points 2 years ago

    As an almost 50 year old gen x who is on disability I will never bad mouth the younger generations for having a hard time financially. I am right there with you. I'll never own my own home, the only reason I can afford my rent is because I've been in the same apartment for 10 years. I'm paying less for a 2 bedroom apartment than it costs to rent a single room these days. I'm going to have to live here until I die because I'll never be able to afford to move.

    Groceries have skyrocketed just since covid and they weren't cheap to begin with either. Even before covid I was paying more for a week's worth of groceries than I was for a months worth of groceries in the 90s.

    Times aren't just tough, they're fucking impossible.

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Fuck the view lol. Everyone that gets a job on that show turns into a jackass, braying their bullshit at top volume. It's the worst side of television.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 54 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Nothing says "I'm old, rich, and out of touch" quite like "get a job, you lazy bums"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago

    Says the person whose primary job for decades now has been to just sit around with other women and gossip. Oh please, get a real job.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    She thinks everyone under 40 is jobless, collecting welfare (???) while eating avocado toast and partying all night. If she hasn't seen the real numbers proving that housing is increasingly out of reach for younger people then her show is to blame, if she has seen the numbers but chooses to sneer "Get a Job!" because it plays to the boomer assholes then she is just a giant piece of shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Start from absolute zero like anyone else and you wouldn't survive a year in today's economy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I’m a fucking engineer, what more was I supposed to do? I should be getting ahead instead of treading water.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago

    What a fucking piece of shit.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I haven't seen it in ages, and I can't critique the approach, but the maker of SuperSize Me tried to spend 30 days doing a minimum wage job. Iirc, it wasn't great and they had so much debt by the end of it.

    I wish these people could get a similar perspective.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    McDonald's made an article about how to live on a McDonald's wage with average costs. They couldn't make it work so the first line in their budget was to get a second job.

    I'm not sure it's still online

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Love how the breakdown of monthly expenses that McDonald's provided includes "Heating: $0"

    Warmth really is a luxury when you think about it though...right? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    They were basically saying it's perfectly normal to work 70-hour weeks and still hardly be able to cover their made-up costs of living (actual costs are much higher in my area, and presumably in most others as well). Oh, and I'm using heat--so I'm pretty much gonna be in debt for life. Guess we should have gone to college/less avocado toast/whatever. But that's just business! Don't hate the player, hate the game! Blah blah blah (งツ)ว

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Barbara Ehrenreich wrote a great book about this called Nickel and Dimed. She was a full time journalist and set out to get a job at a diner and find a place to live on the salary. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel_and_Dimed

    Matthew Desmond's books Evicted and Poverty, By America are amazing, well researched, easily readable books about poverty in the US. I can't recommend them enough. https://www.npr.org/2023/03/17/1158230630/poverty-by-america-book-review-matthew-desmond-evicted

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    This is why it infuriates me so much when people argue that some jobs, "Aren't meant to pay well and live on."

    From the social standpoint: then if that's your argument, anyone looking to support themselves had better be able to find a job that pays better for the skills they have. This not being the case, it suggests that these people are in fact trying to support themselves, they've just found themselves on the wrong side of the capitalist meat grinder, and the argument of the job being one that "isn't supposed to support you" is nothing more than a distraction so you don't have to say the real reason: because you'd rather have the person that serves your diner breakfast be trapped in an endless cycle of poverty than pay an extra dollar for your meal. You're complicit in the process and you like it.

    From the individual standpoint: ignoring for a moment the questions of who gets to decide these sorts of things and where the cutoff lies...isn't it really just creating a convenient circular excuse for greed? These jobs have low pay because they're not meant to support oneself on...but the reason they're not meant to support oneself on is because they have low pay? And that's good enough of an explanation?! People, especially older boomers, like to paint with broad strokes and imply that service industry jobs are "for teenagers in the summer and college kids putting themselves through school", as a way to somehow justify low pay. Now regardless of the demographics of the employee (and we won't even touch the idea of working at any job, much less service industry, to pay for college as you attend in this day and age)... regardless of all that...doesn't it make sense that whoever is doing the work, if the same work is being done the pay should be the same? Granted there's room for seniority, experience, skill, dependability, etc. but the point I'm getting at here is: isn't it ridiculous to say that a kid should be paid less for doing a given job just because they're a kid?

    And regardless of where you stand on the exploitation of child labor, either answer leads you back to the same point: either it's not okay to exploit kids, so kids should make the same as an adult for the same work, so we can pay these workers fairly...or you think it is okay to exploit child labor, in which case, that only makes it okay to short the kids' pay...not the adults. Either way, the only explanation left for subsistence pay for adults is: the system is victimizing the working poor like an elephant sized parasite latched onto an ant, and justifying it by suggesting that if the ant doesn't like it they should just try, you know, making more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Shut up and get in your grave.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Huh, I thought that cackling hen died already.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    I have four. Is four enough jobs for you, Joy?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    My job will be to eat the rich.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›