When I look at Mastodon posts, I see a decent amount of replies and boosts for popular posts, but not very many stars (see example image). I assumed a star is the same as a like, but I feel not a lot of people star a post, whereas I did see a lot of hearts/likes on Twitter posts. Are they not equivalent?

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

In addition to what the others said, there was a „campaign“ a while ago that you should boost and not favorite on Mastodon.

Since there’s no algorithm that promotes liked posts in the timeline, liking something doesn’t do a whole lot.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    I never understood this logic.

    I've been on Mastodon since 2016 and never really got into Twitter. I just don't understand why the "algorithm" matters. Who cares if people who don't follow you see your post? I want my followers to see my posts, and then favorites allow me to know that my followers liked what I posted. It's a nice dopamine boost and helps me feel closer to my community.

    A lot of posts I make unboostable as well (followers only). "Promotion" doesn't really factor much into my use of Mastodon so much as being "social".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago

    As said above, likes are virtually useless. They're more like "noticeable bookmarks". Mastodon etiquette is to boost rather than like, if you enjoy a toot, and that's also how it was when the Twitter timeline was chronological and didn't include likes, a very long time ago.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago*

    On Masotdon, likes don't do anything to extend the reach of a post or make it popular in an algorithm like Twitter. It's literally just a regular like/favorite button, so use it if you want to like/favorite a post.

    Edit: also yes, federation as others have said.

  • source