top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 150 points 3 months ago (1 child)

the other can disappear tomorrow and nothing would change

Not true. People would be living in less fear, and the world would be a far better place.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Not that I disagree with the point generally, but there is a difference of scale here.

    There are around 22k ICE agents. At 150k, that's 3.3b for the first year, and then 2.2b in following years.

    There are around 4m teachers in the US. To raise them all from 55k to the 100k that ICE agents make (ignoring the hiring bonus) would cost 180b/yr. Two orders of magnitude greater.

    I'm not saying it's not worth it. I'm also not saying that ICE agents are good. I'm also not saying this disparity is justified.

    I'm simply saying that the analogy, as given, implies that if we had the money to pay ICE agents 100k+bonuses, then we should have just paid the teachers that much instead. But that's not how the math works. And just because the argument feels good emotionally doesn't mean it's accurate. And the truth shouldn't need a lie to drive it forward. There are plenty of good, factual arguments to make, and this isn't one of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    To be fair, there are plenty other jobs thst could be cut, like CEO of Amazon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    This is true, but the scale goes both ways. For every dollar of public education you get $1+X out. This has been true for the vast majority of public education programs for at least the past half century. So public education is literally a good investment. I’ve never gone looking for data on ICE, but I’d bet good money that for every dollar in there’s a net loss.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago

    In order for that argument to be valid, the country would have to be run as if it could see beyond the next financial quarter.

    It is currently being run as if they are selling off parts of a stolen vehicle for scrap money, and maxing out all the cards they found inside.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    There are around 22k ICE agents.

    They increased payroll by 120% in the last year alone. This does not include private contracts for construction and maintenance of new detainment facilities, coming out of the $45B earmarked by Congress last year.

    There are around 4m teachers in the US. To raise them all from 55k to the 100k that ICE agents make (ignoring the hiring bonus) would cost 180b/yr.

    $45B -> $180B is not two orders of magnitude.

    if we had the money to pay ICE agents 100k+bonuses, then we should have just paid the teachers that much instead

    Pete Hegseth is currently asking Congress for an extra $200B in Pentagon spending, after increasing their budget $71B this year already.

    We clearly don't have a problem with finding more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Also, unless I'm mistaken, teachers aren't paid from the federal budget. I believe that the vast majority of public school funding, including teacher salaries, come from local taxes. In fact, I believe school funding is paid mostly from local property taxes. There isn't one, national public school system that's centrally funded. It's decentralized and can vary significantly from one district to another.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 65 points 3 months ago

    The money is always there. I spent a decade at a job where they constantly told us there was no money for pay raises, constant pressure on employees to cut or manage costs, shitty schedules, etc.

    Then there was a hiring boom. They were throwing money at recruits like crazy. Better pay. Huge signing bonuses that were more than I made in an entire year.

    The money is always there. It’s for the shareholders. Not you.

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    This, and also teachers disproportionately consider their job too important to do to quit completely when mistreated.

    Which the dystopian profit machine takes advantage of to mistreat the shit out of some of the most important and laudable people in the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    I have a friend in Kentucky. Lovely lady. We've known each other about twenty years now. Long time ago she was a waitress earning decent money but wanted to be a teacher. It was going to be a financial hit (the fuck?) but I encouraged her to follow her dream.

    Long story short she lasted two years before being crushed by the machine and quitting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 53 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    If anybody's tempted by those numbers, remember Trump's track record of not paying people.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    they are terrified of everything. there's nothing more affraid in life than a racist right wing fascist turd.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Fear is definitely a reason they love to drive 3-ton trucks to rugged wild places like the office and McDonald's. I have heard my fair share of rednecks call ANY small or normal sized car a "death trap" or "tin can," or comment something like "I'd hate to have somebody crash into me in that thing!"

    "Winning" in a crash is a big unspoken feature that drives vehicle choice for a lot of paranoid/scared iamverybadass turds. Around me it's a pretty varied mix of trucks, truck-based SUV barges, and luxury SUVs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    What have y’all been reading lately?

    I just finished The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow, which I thought was an incredible read. I would recommend anarchists and communists (and really everyone) read it for a pre-historic and historic view of social organization and freedom. What I thought was one of the more interesting concepts they developed was that in pre-contact North America, individuals had three essential freedoms that we have either lost or had greatly diminished: the right of movement, the right to refuse orders, and the right to create new social realities. (I’m slightly paraphrasing their exact language here, already returned the book to the library) They also go pretty deeply into the impact Indigenous North American societies had on European Enlightenment thought. If any of that interests you, I highly recommend it.

    I also just finished The Serviceberry by Robin Wall Kimmerer, which is much shorter but a very lovely examination of gift economies and viewing nature as a gift economy. Solarpunk people, this is probably up your alley.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    In developed countries teachers unionize. They have fair wages, ample benefits, lots of vacation. Their job is still very hard but they somehow feel more valued.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Are you not aware of the teachers union in the US?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    No I wasn't, I'm not from the USA.

    You are correct, it's not even just one there are several apparently. AFT, UFT, NEA... Honestly I'm confused.

    I'm glad the USA does have unions. But there seems to be some roadblocks when I read that some teachers are getting underpaid.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It's always been that way. No money to pay for teachers, no money to pay for universal healthcare, no money to pay for public infrastructure projects...

    But will happily burn 100s billions a year on the military and enforcement agencies.

    The money is in keeping you down, not helping anyone up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    This holds true for almost any "modern" and "civilized" country, not just for the United States.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Join ice. Take the money. Be incompetent. Profit

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    The other can disappear tomorrow and nothing would change

    Not true. If you get rid of jobs that are actively making the world worse, things will almost certainly get better, at least in the short term.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    You could sign up and gum up the fucking works from the inside.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    Read the books

    Kinda hard when the education system fails to teach you how to read.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    I seem to recall hearing they weren't even getting those bonuses, so I had a little poke around on the internet.

    It seems that the $50k sign on bonus only goes to retuning agents that were retired, and paid in $10k chunks, most of which went to taxes.

    Despite the government's attempts to keep the exact details of the offer secret (for instance, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, another DHS agency, placed an asterisk on the $50,000 bonus without seemingly clarifying what its terms are), reports suggest that only retired employees returning to the job are eligible for the bonus and that it comes in $10,000 chunks.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/unpacking-rumor-ice-agents-arent-152800052.html?guccounter=1

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I completely agree with the message but had to snicker at “populous”.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    power always seems to instill a firm belief in one's own immortality.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    I mean, I need a job, and I'd love to be a mole while I'm at it.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    We truly don’t have what they’re offering ICE agents after looking at the way the federal deficit has grown under Trump.

    Just remember that those ICE agents are a bunch of obese, untrained, unprofessional federal agents that continually break laws.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›