Up and down
“Are you up for that?” “Yeah, I’m down”
Up and down
“Are you up for that?” “Yeah, I’m down”
Dust. Dust the shelf, dust the loaf with flour.
Well, this is the opposite thing (same word meaning opposite) but if you ask me it's the same.
EDIT: For some that fit better:
Two examples where erroneous usage has resulted in this paradox:
Regardless and irregardless
"I couldn't care less" and "I could care less"
I don't think either were ever said by competently literate people (wtf is "irregardless"? And do they mean they could "care less" about a subject or do they mean the opposite but don't understand negation?) so idk if this fits what OP was saying entirely. They're just obvious mistakes that have been normalized as people got dumber, right?
Irregardless means “without a lack of regard”. Ergo vis-à-vis if you say irregardless you are actually fully regarded
"flammable" and "inflammable" both describe an object that can easily catch on fire.
Literally means either literally or figuratively, and context doesn't really help.
Literally literally means figuratively, or literally, however figuratively literally only means figuratively.
To bone and to debone both mean to remove bones from something, typically food.
Similarly, peel and unpeel.
Hulled means either the hull is still present or has been removed.
suck and blow
This is kinda the opposite to what you are asking: awesome and awful used to mean the same thing IIRC, both being something filling you with awe. Later the meanings split between positive and negative.
Same with terrible and terrific.
As a non-native English speaker, I always have to think a second extra about "terrific", about it being negative or positive. Probably because it sound similar to "terrible".
I often thought awful was an odd word. Surely awful = full of awe, but it is frequently used to describe things that have little to no awe.
Also I have now said the word awe too much and it looks strange.
Near miss and near hit both mean a close call.
Sanction can mean a punishment or an authorization.
Came up in a DND game where a devil's contract said the players crossing the region would be sanctioned, or something like that. Players thought it meant they had permission, fine print said they would be punished.
One that sorta works:
it's all uphill / downhill from here -> it's only going to get worse
One way mirror and two way mirror
Antiautonym is what you're looking for.
Garnish can either be an enhancing addition such as in a dish, or to take something away such as garnishing wages.
You can lease/rent something to a tenant... Or you can lease/rent something from someone.
The informal definition of "literally" is an exaggeration of something that is not literally true. Inn other words, figuratively.
Slightly different, but single words meaning multiple conflicting things seem to come to mind more readily:
inflammable and flammable
In French there is personne (someone) and personne (no one), plus (more) and plus (no more)
Not the original question you asked, but fits in with your edit:
Priceless and worthless are opposites
For Australians, yeah, yeah nah, yeah yeah nah, nah, nah yeah nah, nah nah yeah, all have subtly different positive and/or negative meanings, often dependent on the situation.
Restless and Restful.
mark and demarcate. I love this one.
also, limit and delimit
a bit of a stretch but i can imagine someone saying "You're a natural" and "you're a freak" to express someone being abnormally talented at something on their first try.
"You're a natural at rock climbing. You're a rock climbing freak. A freak at rock climbing."
While checking words that might work here i was reminded of this annoying trio:
They mean, respectively:
They're called "contranyms". Easy to find examples once you know that
No that's different. A contronym is where the same single word has two opposing meaning. OP is asking for two separate words that sounds like they should be opposites but actually have the same meaning, like flammable and inflammable which both mean "can catch on fire".
top 50 comments