top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 48 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Ah yes, and the turbo light. Offering the illusion of some vague notion of enhanced speed of some sort, somewhere inside box.

I had a pc with a 486mhz processor and and a cordless phone with a 900mhz processor. Both communicated via the same copper wires.

And don't forget Napster. What a time to be alive and chat in the Microsoft network chat rooms.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The cordless phone was a 900MHz radio, not processor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    And it was a 80486 model CPU. Probably at 25MHz.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I have a 486 DX4 that runs at 100mhz. It was faster than the contemporary Pentium that ran at 80mhz. Though this was one of the last 486s and later Pentiums hit higher speeds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    The Turbo button actually slowed down your processor for backwards compatibility reasons. Older software was expecting the CPU clock to be below a certain threshold, and would crash (or run way too fast) if the clock was too fast. Sort of like old games tying the physics to the framerate, then the physics gets all weird when the frame rate changes. The Turbo button was a way to boot old programs without needing to dig into your BIOS to downclock the CPU manually.

    Old games were especially bad about it. They’d rely on the CPU clock for in-game timing, so the game would basically run in super speed if the CPU clock was too fast. The Turbo button allowed you to slow the CPU down to make those games playable again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Why in the hell did they call it "turbo" when it's literally the opposite

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Turbo was the default behavior. There was a toggle button that turned off the turbo light and slowed the machine down when needed for compatibility. Note: almost nobody needed this capability it sometimes they bumped the button and later wondered why the pc was slow.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago*

    The previous user isn't wrong per se, but just to clarify: if the indicator light is on, the "turbo" (default) mode is on and the device is running at full performance. Turbo off means it's downclocked.

    It's more a misnomer to call it turbo when in fact it's just the standard speed of the device, while the mode that is actually toggled using the turbo button is what causes it to run slower for compatibility reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] [S] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I never did AOL or MS chat. I was one of those Usenet and IRC degenerates. Oddly enough, it seems like the true sickos were in AOL/MSN all along.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 40 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Back in 85, they thought 2015 sounds futuristic enough for hoverboards and self lacing shoes.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    I mean, self lacing shoes is really not hard to do. We could have them now. It's just impractical (and potentially dangerous) to put motors, sensors, and a battery in the article of clothing that takes the most impact, experiences the most wear and tear, and it's in closest proximity to puddles of all your clothing items when elastic exists and serves well enough for casual wear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    I think the implication is that they figured out how to do it without all that stuff using vague future tech

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The self drying jacket also suggests that it was some kind of fabric smart tech. There is a bunch of small ideas in the movie that did come true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    I always loved the Conan O’Brien “In the year 2000” bit, and it got even funnier after it actually was 2000.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    No, the other mediocre evening show host, that Colbert fella

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    IIRC, the Jetsons came back to the past to sue everyone for ignoring climate change? I just remember them having to walk rather than use a moving walkway and taking a whole day to reach Harvey's desk. Man, what an awesome show!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago*

    thejetsons.fandom.com/Back_to_the_Present (??):

    In the far off year of 2002, the Jetsons live in their luxurious, futuristic house high above the Earth's surface. Their lives are suddenly turned upside down when the water level begins rising at an alarming rate. Global warming caused the ice caps to melt, and the Earth to become nothing but water. Suddenly, mutants begin breaking into the house, which is unable to get high enough to be out of the water's reach.

    It's funny because that was 12 years ago!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I want to go back to that future. Remember when we had hope?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    We still can! Technology keeps improving. Any social progress whatsoever could yield huge gains in the average person's quality of life, because so much is currently squandered on the wealthy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    now they just put a bunch of adjectives around the product's name

    New Super Phone U Deluxe Pro Max AI

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It’s still the future. 2000 is when we’ll have flying cars. By 2001 we’ll go to space in ships with retro 70s interiors and find an obelisk that makes you hallucinate.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    back in the 1900s

    Welp, guess I'm watching Bojack Horseman the whole way through again.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    We never reached the promised (now retro-)futurism of the distant year 2000.

    We keep surpassing ourselves in that regard.
    Despite the evidence artists retain (sell?) all that hope of the brighter future.

    Even doomer fiction keeps falling short.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Growing up we had exclusively Gateway 2000 computers. When it came time I bought a Gateway laptop. Best computer I ever had. Shortly after it sold to what was eventually Walmart and became a nothing brand. But I had a Gateway. I grew up with Gateway. It was the future. Cows. Now it's less than nothing.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Judge Dredd has entered the chat

    He was featured in a comic called '2000 AD'

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 3 months ago
    [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    Let’s all meet up in the year 2000

    won’t it be strange when we’re all fully grown?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›