top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 197 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

Get off your high fucking horse. Upvotes are for content you want to see, downvotes are for content you don't. Can we stop pretending there's some bullshit morality attached or that they're for anything other than base popularity?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    This isn't right either, upvotes are for whatever I want and downvotes are for whatever I want. Ima fucking downvoted myself now after I post this comment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 90 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    If it's garbage then I'll downvote it and maybe block the user if they continue to post garbage in the future.

    Yes it's effort, but is it constructive?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 77 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Up vote = I agree

    Down vote = I disagree

    Reported = I super disagree

    And anyone who says that they don't do this is a bloody liar.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    For me is

    I agree: upvote

    I disagree: nothing or maybe response

    I think they rare stupid or a troll: downvote and block.

    I'm fed up with something and it keeps popping up: mass downvotes.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 62 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    I'm pretty sure the intent when upvotes and downvotes were created was to use them in regards to relevance. Is the topic about ducks and someone is going off about jeeps? Downvote. Is the community about posting DIY peanut butter but someone keeps posting Skippy™? Downvote.

    It shouldn't have anything to do with agreeing, effort, or anything like that. Just a way to keep the topic/community on track.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Isn't that what was specified in the original reddiquette? Downvote to maintain quality, but not to disagree?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago

    This is silly though, isn't it? Most people think most things that they disagree with are low quality by nature of being something they disagree with.

    Whatever was intended for them, IMO upvotes and downvotes work because everyone just uses them however they want, and the sum total of everyone doing that averages out to a somewhat passable quality sorting system. Trying to tell people how to use their upvotes and downvotes is just yelling into the wind.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago

    Intent is irrelevant. Humans don't work that way and will continue to downvote what they don't like/agree with and upvote what they do like/agree with. Creating a system that ignores how people work and asking them to please use it how you want will never work.

    Everyone should just embrace how it's actually used and move on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 58 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    the reason I upvote a post can differ. sometimes it'll be because I agree with it, sometimes it'll be because I want more people to see it and interact with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Harmful ideas should be downvoted and repressed even if they took effort to type out, actually

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    This isn't Reddit, there's no account-wide tracking of special Internet points to worry about.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 27 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I upvote signal and downvote noise. Novelty is good whether I agree with it or not, redundancy is bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 3 years ago*

    Upvote = I laughed. That's what I came for. To many occasions nowadays where a post's main purpose is something other than making me laugh. Y'all need to entertain me better.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    If everything is upvoted then doesn't that kind of defeat the point? Isn't the point of voting to raise the good stuff to the top? So I don't have to browse furry porn to see some news highlights or shitposts.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 21 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)
    [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    Sometimes I see memes I don't agree with, but I'll still upvote if they're funny. If you can't laugh at yourself every now and then, you're probably not a secure person

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago

    We don't need posts that are like, Facebook quality

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Redditors want to make rules now, huh?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    Why should we care what motivates people to upvote or downvote?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    I only upvote comments if the person posted something I was going to post myself. Saves me time. If I think the post itself is cool I upvote the post.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Has anyone made a Simpsons shitpost thing I can join? That's pretty much all I miss from reddit. That and Slay by Comment

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    I frequently upvote amd comment here as a means of contribution because we need to make Lemmy bigger and pull in users.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›