submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by to c/politics@lemmy.world
 

Newsom and his team have successfully tapped into the need that many rank-and-file Democrats have for adopting a confrontational approach to Trump and his policies. But few people outside of California know much about the governor’s actual record — and many Democratic voters will be turned off to learn that his fervent opposition to a billionaire tax is part of an overall political approach that has trended more and more corporate-friendly.

A year ago, Newsom sent about 100 leaders of California-based companies a prepaid cell phone “programmed with Newsom’s digits and accompanied by notes from the governor himself,” POLITICO reported. One note to the CEO of a big tech corporation said, “If you ever need anything, I’m a phone call away.” While pandering to business elites, Newsom has slashed budgets to assist the poor and near-poor with healthcare, housing and food – in a state where seven million live under the official poverty line and child poverty rates are the highest in the nation.

...

“Governor Newsom’s reluctance to propose meaningful revenue solutions to help blunt the harm of federal cuts undermines his posture to counter the Trump administration.” The statement said that the proposed budget “will leave many Californians without food assistance and healthcare coverage.”

So far, key facts about Newsom’s policy priorities have scarcely gone beyond California’s borders. “National media have focused on Newsom as a personality and potential White House candidate and have almost completely ignored what he has and has not done as a governor,” said columnist Dan Walters, whose five decades covering California politics included 33 years at the Sacramento Bee. “It’s a perpetual failing of national political media to be more interested in image and gamesmanship rather than actual actions, the sizzle rather than the steak, and Newsom is very adept at exploiting that tendency.”

Also see https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/10/gavin-newsom-presidential-candidate-democrats

Like Trump, Newsom breaks promises, serves billionaire interests and mistakes social media theatrics for leadership. Is that really what American voters will want in 2028? After Richard Nixon, Americans chose Jimmy Carter. After George W Bush, they chose Barack Obama. After Trump, they’ll likely want change – authentic, strong, moral leadership, a leader with competence and vision.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 118 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (17 children)

Anywhere else in the country, Newsom would have run as a Republican.

Genuinely, if Newsom is selected by the Democratic party in 2028, nothing will change and we'll be staring down the barrel of trump 2.0 the next fake populist/fascist in 2032.

There are only two ways for the Democratic party to be relevant at this point:

  1. Support politicians who bring actual change to improve people's lives
  2. Actually punish Republican politicians for all of the crimes that they are doing in broad daylight right now.

But the Dems showed in NY how they feel about #1, and are refusing to do anything with #2 in Minnesota (and completely fumbled the opportunity they had over the last few years decades nationwide)

Edit: for the pedantic twats that couldn't infer my meaning

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    I disagree with this. He has a quintessentially non-GOP and Progressive LEAN. It's just he grew up rich, became MORE rich, then got into politics young, so the other half half of him is a piece of shit.

    He likes to think he USED to be a piece of shit, but he's still at least half a piece of shit.

    Slicked back hair. Glass House. White Ferrari. Live for New Year's Eve. Sloppy steaks at Truffoni's. Big rare cut of meat with water dumped all over it, water splashing around the table...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago*

    If you think he’s progressive you must not live in California. We have a pretty progressive legislature and he vetoes EVERYTHING that upsets shareholders or techbros. He literally let PG&E get away with murdering 800 Californians, he allows PG&E to not buy back power from solar panels and he allowed 6 rate hikes last year so they could continue to make record shareholder profits. Now he’s fighting the one time 5% billionaire tax proposed by our legislators. He created a task force to hunt down teachers that teach the correct history on Palestine and under the guise of “antisemitism”. He also has time for a podcast somehow and he literally platforms Nazis and Zionists and agrees with them it’s disgusting. He’s Pelosi’s nephew and he’s basically a neoliberal republican

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    All the not-Republicans need to pick a leader now. Before one is picked for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 61 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    progressive credentials

    He's only progressive if you squint a little, really want very badly to see him as progressive, and then pretend his actions line up with his progressive speech. And even the left-most of his speech is really milquetoast progressive, like elevator muzak rock and roll.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 48 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    libs in this thread, having already settled for mediocrity 2 years before there’s an election lol

    like yea guys, keep putting shitass unappealing candidates and blaming their loss on scary internet communists who, as we all know, actually account for most of the non-voting population in the US. it worked so well the last checks notes 2 times.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    Last 3x, and it's the same strategy they've been running for 36 years, since 1990 with Bill Clinton, Epstein super friend. Total coincicence I'm sure that the democratic party was captured by a faction of the ruling class right when the israeli honeypot operation ensnared them all in child fucking blackmail, and god knows what else they have them on.

    It's not just about Israel is the thing. It's a lot of the same billionaires with designs on the US to follow in that direction. And we don't know who all got copies of what blackmail they accumulated over three decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 47 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    He does fine as a thorn in Trump's side. But that's it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 34 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    You mean he does fine as the WWE kfabe opponent to Trump who performs the character of a resistance fighter on stage right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    For a corporate Dem like Newsom, that’s the most we’re ever going to get is theatre. So yeah.

    To this post’s point, hell no on rallying behind him in ‘28. There are those who claim the DNC leadership has evolved and won’t be captured by corporate interests this time around. I think whether they attempt to shove Newsom down our throats is the perfect test of this theory.

    Unfortunately, so much hangs in the balance of that decision. Really hate the two party trap we’re living in, at times like this especially.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago (15 children)

    At this point, I would vote for an upturned mop painted with lipstick for president.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)

    Gruesome Newsom WILL lose the Democrats the election. They keep putting up milque toast corporatist candidates then wonder why no one left of them really wants to vote for them. I've been whipped on by them so long to "Vote Blue No Matter Who" I'm going to tell them to pound dirt if they select Newsom. This entire "voting for the lesser evil" bullshit is so old. When we had a chance to get someone decent in office they pulled the rug out from under him to put in Hillary. Nope, not playing that game anymore Neo-Libs. You're just as bad as the Republicans to me now.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    It's really really simple folks. Vote your conscience at the primary. Vote pragmatically in the general. Primaries are for changing your party from within. The general is for winning.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Two years away. Useless to even talk about this. Everyone remember desantis? Yeah, see how that turned out.

    Relax and vote in every election, especially primaries. But yeah... Relax.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    And we wait two years and people say oh well let's pick the safe option and we have the most corporate candidate shoved down our throats again for the fourth time (Hilary, Biden, Kamala, and I guess Newsom)

    We can't wait, our problems are too large in this country. We need significant changes, fdr level.

    If we elect another corporate candidate then our fate is sealed, pretty much proves magas point and we leave room for fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I sincerely hope democrats do not spend another 4 years playing to the center and failing to prosecute or reform. I was satisfied with Biden on most issues at the time. He was better for unions than Obama. In retrospect- Biden was not a good candidate because he led back to Trump's second term. What kind of future would Newsom bring in 2032?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›