top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 2 years ago (27 children)

Does anyone use this? I've yet to find a defining feature list of why anyone should use it aside from cosmetic differences. Does it even have a defining feature set?

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean, you literally described 99,999% of distros tbf.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Sure, but that's what I'm asking about. Why should people try this one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    A better question might be why shouldn't they? I'm not being pedantic (at least not intentionally) but if their defining characteristic is that they're nothing special, just a simple Linux distro that does the basic shit easily enough and looks nice - that has major appeal to people unfamiliar with Linux looking to leave other OS's behind. The vast majority of people that use an OS really have very little idea how it works or why. They just want some basic level of understanding and control over it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I use it. It's great. I've tried Linux many times over the past decade but it never stuck until Zorin. If you're coming from Windows it's a very friendly (and polished) way of being welcomed to Linux while also showing off Linux's strengths, things that are often hidden to the user unless they want to explore the terminal.

    For Mac users who are Linux-curious I would recommend Ubuntu because it's much similar, whereas Zorin seems clearly designed with people who liked Windows 10 but not Windows 11.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If you want something like Mac, use elementary os.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    oh yeah. its an out of the box for folks (like myself) who like that. Lots of apps preinstalled including play on linux. So I can install and start using without adding any additional software. Its not the only oob distro but combining that with the look feel emulation is great and I have never seen an oob that sets up wine so well to use immediately. So its a bit like a combo of a gaming distro with oob and then the lookNfeel thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (21 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    So let me get this straight, they have a windows look by default, but using GNOME for whatever reason, then they give you the option to switch to something more vanilla GNOME but disable all of the gestures and workspaces, and then they advertise it like they invented gestures when they decide to stop disabling all of them

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Is it me or does most of this look like Gnome? 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So basically Ubuntu-based GNOME-skin OS, advertising GNOME’s new features as their own?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    This looks beautiful, congrats to Zorin contributors!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Not much of a progress this time.

    Still waiting for zorin grid.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    We need fewer distros and more focus on things that matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    I think a unified package manager/app store model that is vetted by all contributing distros would go a long way. SteamOS/Steam deck is bringing gamers to linux and that's great. But it would be easier to bring on a lot more desktop users if there was an app store that every distro could visit. Flatpak is close, snaps however I think are too polarizing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I disagree. Each distro is a user of a thousand different open source systems. When a distro developer integrates gnome, systemd, bluez, or whatever other system they're finding, reporting, and possibly fixing bugs that end users might miss. Other than arch users, who else is compiling these things from scratch and really digging into the documentation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    All the shit I hate about windows packed into a Linux environment... I guess maybe it will help Windows users switch over?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    mfw when entire distros are advertising UI features of gnome that came standard on every DE like 15+ years ago, including gnome.

    Seriously, Compiz is from 2006.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Distributions nowadays are defined by their desktop bling :(

    It used to be that you could just install whatever desktop you fancied on pretty much any distro.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›