And pull themselves up by their bootstraps as usual?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 156 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Imagine living in the 2020's in the developed world and not realizing that internet access is a basic necessity.

Then imagine being the sort of person who would deny poor people basic necessities

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 77 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Might want to get that cough checked out. ...unless you're in America, in which case you probably couldn't afford it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Best I can do is an aspirin I found on the train and sleep it off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sleep? What do you think this is, a spa?

    Get back to work, paid sick days are just a myth perpetuated by the evil socialist europeans. Don't look it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you don’t come into work today you are going to put undue burden on all of your coworkers. It’s certainly not my fault for staffing to the absolute bare minimum so that there is no room for people to be sick or take days off, it’s your fault for being a lazy worker

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They know full well that internet is a necessity to participate in society.

    That is why they are blocking it with every fibre of their being.

    To them, poor people are poor because god is angry at them. They deserve to be poor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago*

    It's not that nefarious, it's more "we're a bunch of wealthy assholes and we know the best way to make the most money without having to actually make something worth a shit is to privatize necessities and then monopolize them. You literally need to buy from me! Also, you lot don't work hard enough."

    I hate these people with every fiber of my being.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    My mom works with internet people. I remember when I was a kid she was making fun of them for saying internet should be a basic human right. Nowadays, it would be hard to find someone who doesn't think that lol

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 73 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Hows about "Create local and municipal fiber to the curb to stoke competition and drive down prices" instead ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago*

    The local fiber provider skipped my street altogether because spectrum has a contract with the apartments, and they don't think it's worth running fiber to compete. I wish this was a joke. The providers are literally NOT competing at all. Residential homeowners are screwed because spectrum has a chokehold on the other half of the neighborhood.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's literally a fucking necessity so if course it's privately owned... It's so ridiculous how we treat necessities... Tell me what job you can apply to that doesn't require it to be done over the Internet?

    I remember when I could walk in to a store and shake the managers hand, then things changed and I got looked at like I was crazy "just go online and apply, why are you here?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    My coop power company installed fiber, so my ISP is a coop. IMO I'd rather this that purely nationalized.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Co-ops are cool, but markets in general have far too many disadvantages for me to advocate for market-based Socialism over a non-market solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago*

    the sad bit is, wireline internet providers could sell $30 per month high-speed internet and still make money at that lower rate and without subsidies.

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Every penny that goes to social programs to help the poor is a penny that isn't going to corporations and their billionaire donors. Of course they want to cancel it, along with social security, medicare and public libraries.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Always have money for war and bloodshed

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Damn 30$ discount. How much do you pay in the states for broadband access. I pay about 40$ each month for a 500/500 connection.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    In a city a connection like that is probably going to be in the area of $60 to $100. I pay $80 all in for a similar fiber connection.

    Outside of a city you just aren't going to get it.

    There are a few places that have Community ISPs where it will be substantially less expensive, but those are the exceptions and many states have actually made it illegal to operate community ISPs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    paying almost $90 now, here, for supposedly 300mbps (downstream) that barely ever gets past 60. there are people near me that pay about the same for 1mbps or less dsl (just outside of cable's territory, so dsl is all they have)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Just take it out of the oil and gas subsidies.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Wasn't there a debate awhile ago that internet is a necessity rather than a luxury?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It’s what Republican Jesus would do, fuck the poor. We could fund Israel’s war with all that wasteful spending!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    Fucking poor people!! Have they tried NOT being poor!? Bunch of lazy entitled poors!! /s

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Both parties are the same!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Lot of Republican governors of states that signed a letter urging this subsidy to be renewed. Seriously, broadband subsidies for rural areas should be renewed.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Lmao, their problem with it, is that the vast majority of people using the ACP already had Internet before signing up....Which just proves how much of a necessity Internet is.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 6 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Republican members of Congress blasted a program that gives $30 monthly broadband discounts to people with low incomes, accusing the Federal Communications Commission of being "wasteful."

    The lawmakers suggested in a letter to FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel that they may try to block funding for the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP), which is expected to run out of money in April 2024.

    The letter questioned Rosenworcel's testimony at a recent House hearing in which she warned that 25 million households could lose Internet access if Congress doesn't renew the ACP discounts.

    "At a hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on November 30, 2023, you asserted—without evidence and contrary to the FCC's own data—that '25 million households' would be 'unplug[ged]…from the Internet' if Congress does not provide new funding for the ACP," the letter said.

    As Congress considers the future of taxpayer broadband subsidies, we ask you to correct the hearing record and make public accurate information about the ACP."

    Unfortunately, your testimony pushes "facts" about the ACP that are deeply misleading and have the potential to exacerbate the fiscal crisis without producing meaningful benefits to the American consumer.


    The original article contains 546 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›