all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 6 months ago

In 2024, creative industries minister Chris Bryant admitted that Brexit had made touring in Europe “simply not economically viable” for many artists.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    What are those "withholding taxes"? Is it something most of which they will get back in a year or two?

    And of course: Why does Sony organize tours this way? Make them employees of a EU-based company and pay them through that. Should remove most of complications.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    In some countries, if you hire artists for an event, you are responsible for withholding taxes that are due on the artist’s income. Regular employment often works like this too. Taxes that are withheld at the source are called withholding taxes.

    For example if I were to host an artist from the UK for an event here in Germany, I would have to deduct ~15% of their pay and pay it directly to the German tax authority. Basically in the same way that if I hired an employee in Germany I would have to estimate the income tax on their salary and withhold it too.

    You can’t generally get these taxes back because they are normal taxes that are just paid in a specific way. But foreign artists from a country that both taxes foreign income and has some kind of double taxation agreement with the country they’re performing in would be able to get some of their tax payments back. There may be other reasons too, I’m not familiar with regulations regarding artists.

    For normal employees it’s not uncommon either for the final tax to be different from what was withheld and then the difference is paid/reimbursed when they file their taxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    So, they somehow forgot that income tax exists?

    How can the existence of income tax come as a surprise?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Income tax only exists over a certain threshold in the UK, so they would be expecting a fair amount back if they didn't earn particularly much l

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Ah, and they didn't expect the non-UK income and the UK income to count towards the same threshold?

    At least in Finland the 0% tax bracket ends at something like 1300 € per month, and I doubt they were getting that little per person for touring internationally.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    hello,

    Sony doesn’t book tours. they are a label.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Isn't the point of a label to organize getting money to you from people listening to your music?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    yes, supposedly. Inherently they‘re concept is publishing, but the margins on streaming revenue are slim to none so touring is in fact a viable way of creating income. and big labels operate on the same principle as any commercial company, money. it is not art or fame or glory, it is money.

    If you like there is a recent video from Benn Jordan on YT analyzing revenue streams from streaming companies. fucked up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I work in the livesound field, and to my experience, music and music business are separate things. You need business management knowledge to be a band/an artist these days. Or you hire someone for that. The desaster mentioned in the article is a home made problem, this should have been calculated beforehand (probably was) but even if artists don‘t break even there will always be someone saying „but the output and reception you will receive is your capitalism the future“ (marketing). I pity British artists because brexit but business is business. calculate beforehand.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Paywalled.

    And auto playing video of something entirely different.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Archive comes up as a suggestion when posting a link. I didn't understand the thread, what's the risk?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Good info. So it's still alright to use for sites like FT and the likes then. ;-)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Financial Times. Large sites should be able to handle the extra traffic.

    Maybe not okay to use, but at least not risky from a personal perspective.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    So by using archive.is I'm part of the ddos against this blog?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)