top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 152 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The real MVPs are websites not needing a cookie banner because they only use required cookies for which you dont need a banner.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They still have to inform you, right? Like with some banner at the edge of the page telling that they use cookies, just no need for a popup asking you to accept or decline.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No it’s only for tracking cookies. If you just have cookies for login, for example, then there’s no need to ask permission

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 83 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Just FYI - it's mandatory to have a button like that next to the 'Accept all'.

    Every site that doesn't do it should be reported.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The serious answer is to whatever your country's internet regulation agency is (assuming your in the EU, else you're out of luck). So for example, in France that would be the CNIL, in Germany it's the BfDI, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Just FYI Germany likes to make things more difficult, so with federation every sub-area is separated in many aspects and has own agencies for different things..

    BfDI is only responsible for health and internet-provider institutions (and a few more).
    Otherwise you can send it to the one where the company is located at, or always where you are located at. (they will forward it, but that can take a few months, so better to submit where it has to go).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    If that's so it's incredibly poorly enforced to the point where complaining is unlikely to have any effect at all. Most Sites have a button that leads To a secondary menu where cookie preferences can be set. Perhaps this meets the mandate you speak of? It's a much more common setup.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Or just sites that don't need a consent popup because they don't sell your shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    "well, we're not selling it, we're just using 247 advertising agencies to measure the general performance of our site. Nothing targeted, we'd never do that." - totally legit companies that absolutely value user rights

    /s, if that wasn't obvious enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago

    The real MVPs are website not having cookies altogether

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    NEVER click decline all. There are loopholes built in that still grant access to "legitimate interest" cookies, which are recognized differently from "consent cookies." If you click reject all, it still allows collection of certain personal info through cookies labeled legitimate interest. Which is entirely up to advertisers to categorize.

    As annoying as it is, always open up options and manually uncheck cookies.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Seriously? Why does everything just have to be awful all the time now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    With TCF 2.2 "legitimate interest" is no longer allowed (but that's probably only for IAB members). At our company we already had a rule where we disabled all "legitimate interests" from our vendors, so I assume there are other companies that do the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I highly recommend the Firefox extension “I still don’t care about cookies” as a great successor to the original

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/istilldontcareaboutcookies/

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    by the way, I've always been subconsciously curious but never asked anybody, what happens when we click "ok yes I accept cookies?" And What happens if we click " not ok, I don't accept cookies?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Depends on the implementation. If you decline, it's either 1) no cookies are written at all and you get promoted again the next time you visit that site or 2) a single cookie is written only remembering that you declined the prompt.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    My favorite banner is from geizhals.de that only says "We recognize you set "Do not track" and we respect that."

    Edit: autocorrect corrected

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In Firefox 120+ about:config -> cookiebanners.service.mode 2 (from 0)

    No addons required.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago*

    Istilldontcareaboutcookies + cookieautodelete - you da real mvp

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    ✅ Delete cookies and site data when Firefox is closed

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How do you delete data that’s already transferred to their servers while you visit the page? You don’t need a cookie to uniquely identify a user.

    https://www.amiunique.org/fingerprint

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    I think they will break laws (in countries with basic respect for human right) if they don't have that option.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Some US news websites still geoblock European visitors rather than fix their site to not track the ever loving fuck out of visitors who say no. So imagine what they're doing to their domestic visitors.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    But does it really decline all, or are you agreeing to their "legitimate interest" of stealing your data?

    Data collection is theft, change my mind.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    See our legitimate partners (1724)...

    I don't want my data sent to 1724 partners just because i am curious to see what that click bait of a title really meant

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    how certain are you that this will truly block them all? Many of these things may have a "Legitimate interest" thing going on, and I do not trust those prompts to object to that by pressing "reject all"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Should be the default option

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago*

    uBlock origin on Firefox blocks almost all tracking sites. You can enable cookies or disable them, it doesn't matter because they aren't sent anywhere. Unless the site has some homebrew tracking solution.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I hope that includes what other sites would call "strictly necessary". No thanks, if your site won't work without, then I don't need to visit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Ghostery plugin gang rise up!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Vivaldi has setting to block these.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›