Don't see what the problem is, most of these big brands love to fuck people.

Today's pegging is sponsored by Nestle.

Better seen on Pornhub next to some anal fisting than on Twitter/X next to blatant nazi propaganda.

Many sites have to get rid of adult content because of complains. Now what they are also going to blame porn sites for having porn?

who the fuck cares why is this bad

Youtube: Nooooo!! You can't say the fuck-fuck word in the first three minutes of the video and you can't cover content that isn't friendly to our advertisers!! If you do anything out of line we will demonetize you!!!
Meanwhile, Google:

Oh no, not on HARDCORE porn!

I mean, in front of my salad?!

As usual, redditors lemmings commenting on an article they haven't read. This isn't just about your brand appearing on a standard porn site. It's also about your brand appearing on disinformation sites like Breitbart. Also, if your ads appear on those sites, it means that very probably your money is ALSO going to those sites.

I know that when I’m watching two hairy jocks fuck each other’s brains out is exactly the moment I’m thinking of buying a new set of LG kitchen appliances at The Home Depot’s Black Friday sale.

did they blame the client for caring, and then sue whomever discovered it? i hear thats very popular lately.

Caught? Is this illegal?

Hold on a second.

Someone saw these ads and thought "I should admit to my porn habits to spread this information that materially doesn't affect me, but puts revenue in Googles wallet and probably doesn't harm the big brands at all?"

Can people not separate ads from what ever they are reading/watching in their minds?

This is the best summary I could come up with:

According to an Adalytics report, the Google Search Partner Network (SPN) has allegedly been putting brands at risk of all of these undesirable placements without advertisers fully realizing the dangers.

Among those impacted were big brands—like Amazon, Apple, BMW, Home Depot, Lego, Meta, Microsoft, Paramount+, Samsung, and Uber—and top government entities including the US Treasury and the European Commission.

Ads from nonprofits like the American Cancer Society and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, as well as major media outlets like The Guardian, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal were also found on illegal or adult sites.

To determine roughly how seedy the SPN might be, Adalytics relied on open source data and web crawlers to flag search ads displayed on 7.2 million sites.

According to MediaPost, it has been estimated that the SPN "generates about $10.5 billion annually" for Google, while requiring advertisers to "acknowledge that our policies meet any image and reputation standards you may have for your company” before creating an ad campaign in its Search Network.

Adalytics' report included a disclaimer that its "study does not allege that any entities violated US Treasury or international sanctions or any other anti-money laundering (AML) laws."

The original article contains 684 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

right in front of my pasta en brodo?!

Holy shit who gives a fuck