all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 9 months ago (3 children)

On smartphones people are used to package managers already. Imagine everyone had to download the executables for every update for each app on their phone, going to their website downloading and such. That's basically how Windows works. Such a Stone Age.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    It's the kind of thing that took me years to get comfortable with but these days it should be standard, provided we also have the ability to manually install our own shit (sideeyeing Google's upcoming garbage policy)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    flatpak based arch distro with no traditional package manager, just a "store" gui app

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Tbh this sounds great to install for a Linux noob

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    I think that is what they were going for. The article has some rationalizations for their decisions. I'm not their target audience but like you say I do see the appeal. I do like the system img roll back features though. I think a lot of new to medium users don't back up properly and then get frustrated at breaking changes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    "In KDE Linux, we build the base system out of Arch packages, but freeze the contents and take responsibility for the result being functional; we don’t offload responsibility onto the user."

    Is this the same that Manjaro does?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Pretty interesting, kudos to them for building a different system and not yet another distro. The end result of having a ton of pre-installed software in the hope that it covers your hardware and workflows makes it a pass for me as I'm all about being lightweight and modular, but it does seem like an almost perfect grandma distro.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Honestly this is basically a non-gaming Bazzite using Arch as the base instead of Fedora Atomic, which is technically mutable. I've been trying it out and maybe I should give distrobox a whirl for some things. Overall I've been happy with it.

  • source
  • [+] -14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    TIL KDE is a distro and not a DE. 🙄

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments