YouTube blames ad blockers for slow load times, and it has nothing to do with your browser | The delay is intentional, but targeting users who continue using ad blockers, and not tied to any browse...::YouTube has clarified in a statement that users who use ad blockers will have a suboptimal experience regardless of their browser.

all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 174 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah, sure. That's why it happens on Firefox even without an adblocker, and goes away when using a user agent switcher to claim you're using Chrome instead of Firefox while using an adblocker. Because it's toooooooootally about adblocking.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I tried this exact scenario and didn't see any difference in load times. I'm using an ad blocker and it's definitely sluggish, but switching to a Chrome user agent made no difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    Yeah, people seem to be having very different experiences with it. It might genuinely be them rolling out different versions to different people to bug test it or something like that. Even if that's the case I still think its probably not unintentional that it hurts Firefox more. They do that too much for me to believe it's an accident.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How thoroughly was this tested? Because you can summarize a lot of these types of timing differences with one word.

    Caching.

    And from my experience people tend to overlook this when running casual tests like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    This is 100% anecdotal of course, but I've noticed weirdly inconsistent behaviour. I have one tab I permanently keep open for YouTube and that one loads videos really fast. If I open a second tab by following a link from that main tab, then it partly loads the site and sits there for a weirdly long time before any content even appears.

    I've got a really fast connection too, and nothing else was having issues. This whole thing is bizarre.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So if I use Firefox I have a choice between a 5sec delay or a 5sec delay and ads. That seems like an easy choice.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -47 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I would assume the ad gives the creator some revenue while the delay doesn't

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There are other ways to give to creators. You can tip, many have stores, patreon and floatplane among other ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Of course, and if you support creators that way I respect it, but most people never do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    the ad is poison to my soul tho so its still better to delay

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -21 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    That's extreme lol, I barely notice ads, they hardly exist to me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Well, I have quite strong "anti spam filters" IRL. I often don't even notice there are adverts around me or commercials in radio/television running somewhere in background. But youtube? Holy hell that's another story. I just hate it when there are 5 unskippable 1+ minute ads in 10 minute video. It's retarded and the only effect it has on me is I start to boycot the product/brand/service I see there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If they really had guts... go full paywall mode. No freemium with ads bullshit.

    Don't pretend like hook and bait business model is not being used here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    If YT did that, another company would just come and steal their market share with the same freemium system

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I will stop using youtube before I stop using adblockers.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    My opinion too. A lot of people say "Oh I couldn't live without it, I'm constantly watching vids on there" so you ask for recommendations, look them up, and it's 99% brain-rotting video porridge

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [+] -10 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Brave, Orion and Vivaldi are also still standing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    That is also true of Chromium browser is it not? Can you provide evidence of questionable or unethical privacy practices by Brave?

    Here is what code Brave removes. 👍🏻

    Where does most of Firefox’s financial support come from? 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Yes it is also true of Chromium which is why it's not a matter of finance or money. Brave is simply Chromium based, like Chrome, while Firefox is using its own engine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago*

    The other day my wife asked me "what's that pipe website you use to be able to watch YouTube videos" then I realized it was because she got blocked by YouTube haha

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Android TV: SmartTube

    iOS (Sideload or Jailbreak): uYou+

    MacOS/Linux/Windows: FreeTube

    Every Browser: Invidious

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Funny how soon it will seem as if chrome is the most used browser while it's actually Firefox with a user agent change

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    I can already imagine the bullshit wired articles about how users are Switching from Firefox to Chrome, remember how they tried to claim people were uninstalling ad blockers, when in reality they were switching to uBlock Origin, that was pretty funny.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've got Firefox and Ublock, and don't see any delays, warnings, etc. It may have to do with the fact that I'm not signed in with an account.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Remember that just like with everything YouTube doesn't apply changes to all users across the whole site simultaneously. They always do gradual rollout with randomized user impact. So as to not upset or raise too many alarms at the same time. It's been their MO for about 10 years now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    As has been the MO of many large sites for a while now. It's called blue-green deployment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah it looks like they've switched away from the 5-second penalty for having ad blockers to counting down the number of videos you'll be shown, then after 3-2-1 it's 'adblockers violate youtube's toc'

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I'm using DNS level ad blocking, anyone else not experiencing anything weird?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Sundar can diaf

  • source