In the last couple of months I have noticed an increasing trend of supplying me search results that are completely unrelated to the current query and tie back to my location or previous searches. I can say this with a high degree of certainty this is without a doubt beyond the 100th instance this has happened.

My browser is configured against tracking and fingerprinting (in fact all my devices are) which would make it fairly difficult to retain any data unless they are profiling me.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 100 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I've also noticed that if you do a search, click a result, then hit back to go back to the results they manipulate the results in some weird way so they're not the exact same results you got the first time. Infuriating

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Odd. I wonder what is going on here because when I search that exact same query I get accurate results.

    I’ve had iffy search results before but never anything that bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    great. i finally get off google and now duckduckgo is bad. i hate the internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It has been doing this shit for a while. Returning results based on just one key word out of many keywords from my query.

    Lately they have been even ignoring the restrictive +"keyword" syntax and returning whatever shit just so they won't admit their (or Microsoft's indexer) is shit

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What would we suggest as a realistic alternative? Sears? Startpage? Brave? (I am no expert by the way, just looking for tips)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I just switched to using Kagi recently and I like it a lot so far! Theres a free tier for 100/searches a month you can use to figure out if you like it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Me too. I was so reluctant to pay for a search engine at first since there are good alternatives out there I don't have to pay for. But I just at least wanted to try the first 100 free searches and was blown away by how great it is. It has some unique features like prioritizing or blocking specific domains, lenses and custom bangs. I payed the $10 the same day for Pro tier and 5 days later (yesterday) I even upgraded to Ultimate tier with ChatGPT-4 (called Kagi Assistant). I really, really enjoy Kagi so far. Most probably it's gonna be my one and only search engine for the next years to come.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Searx sucks for images in my experience, startpage was bought by an advertising company, brave is weird for a multitude of reasons but I don't know how good their search engine is as I've never tried it

    However I do think that finding a searx instance that works for you and then using another engine like ddg for images is the way to go... You could add a shortcut like ".ddg garbage truck" for easily searching with for example ddg on firefox

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How does searx suck for images exactly? 🫠

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Also a bit confused by this. I thought the point of searxng is to combine your preferred search engines. So couldn't I just configure ddg for the image results?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Maybe their point was that you cannot filter the images, like by color, size, license, etc

    But anyway, if I want to show somebody a picture of something it works perfectly As for the results, they are pretty comparable between searx, ddg, and googlag.

    I would even say searx wins on this one because 1. It's easier to navigate and open images 2. The nojs version of the search looks so much better than any other search engine

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Try kagi.com

    I you have to pay for it, but t's amazing

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Thanks for mentioning Kagi! I've been looking for some Google/DDG replacement but every single one I've tried had some sort of dealbreaking drawback for me. Google collects all my data and heavily filters my results, DDG provides dogshit results most of the time I don't even bother using it, Startpage is awfully slow, and I didn't even get to understand what Searx is as looking for it led me to some random ugly pages.

    Subbed for 1 year 10 bucks plan. Works super-fast on mobile too. Hell yeah!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    I get the same shit at work where I can't use a VPN: like 7-8 relevant results then basically just ads for local businesses after that.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    It does though? Right under the search bar there should be a switch bar to turn on localized search, and a dropdown to pick different location.
    Or is it itself location locked?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I have searx, and i'm feeling like a god of search, better than google, better that bingbinggo, and anything else Although I had a lot of problems with it when I was hosting it on a RPI and docker, now i'm not, and it's just so much better

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    I have still the same good results in ddg, no matter what device or browser. I have noticed that they have some location bias when ddg (and any other search engine i have tried) has non good results globaly but good resulta locally.

    Still better then anything i have tested. Just because there are minor anomalies i will stick with them.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    On DDG I can type in an exact company or product name and not get a proper result, it's crazy. Google seems to find the stuff no problem, it's really quite frustrating when the search engine isn't even capable of basic queries.

  • source
  • [+] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Yes, I have the same issue with DDG for something like a year now. I can't use it anymore for basic searches, I feel like the bing api they are using is getting worse and worse.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    If you’re looking for a new search engine, I’ve been using paid search provider, Kagi.com, for the last few months. They’ve been great.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    I feel like ddg has never had good search results

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I paid for Kagi and have been super happy with it. If you don't mind paying, I highly recommend it. Not having ads or manipulated results is worth it for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    I turned JS off other than for specific websites. This includes DDG. It gives me accurate results, although the other commenters don't seem be facing your problem either

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Same here. Every time I ditch Google and go to ddg, I just laugh how irrelevant all the results are and I continue feeding Google with personal data and telemetry and whatnot.

    It is true that even Google's results feel much worse than before but it's still significantly better than ddg.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    It might be blindly searching for websites that contain any of the words scan, mark 2, pro.

    It seems to do that when it can't find a page with all of the words, and the only way I know to fix it is put the whole thing in quotation marks.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I feel like Qwant has become the best when it comes to the quality of the search results. My experience with kagi is limited, though.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    The only time I use ddg is to find conspiracy sites to add to the blocklist I maintain. All the trash rises to the top in that search engine. It's rubbish.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    My browser (Firefox) is configured the same way.

    No issues with your search term here. I think you have gremlins.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    The time to ditch DDG came when they started gatekeeping during the first Russia thing, COVID, etc.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›