all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 94 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Uh yeah... It isn't. Like at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah, but I got absolutely roasted in YouTube comments for pointing out some potential shortcomings in the architecture. I’m not about to claim a high level of authority on the topic, though I’m an old man who has been in the game for a while, but the people that were totally confident really just seemed very eager to accept the passing of their credentials in a very sketchy way to get a slightly different messaging experience.

    Just use signal folks.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    If everyone you text with are on iPhone anyway, there’s no logical reason to switch iMessage off and use SMS.

    Never personally had any issues with iMessage (not sure which parts you think “suck” and are “unstable”).

    80% of my contacts use iMessage, the rest use Signal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    Yeah no shit, it's a badly put together hack. They should not be advertising this embarrassing mess.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    That's saying something as I don't think anyone thought it was particularly secure

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don’t get the buzz around this. It’s a really ugly hack, it’s costing someone money to run those mac servers, and the longevity of the service is questionable.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why does iMessage need a solution? Solutions indicate problems. The only problem I can see is elitist kids and people whining about bubble colors.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    The problem is breaking up the network effect from messaging apps.

    Noone is uninstalling WhatsApp since there's always that one guy you need to keep in contact with that refuses to change.

    Having aggregators like this is helping break up this

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Beeper is pretty good with it, as they make it clear that it's insecure and use an encrypted protocol to get the messages to the server. Still, it's better to host your own (which Beeper lets you do, as it's just Matrix) or not use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The sheer volume of cves is not necessarily an indicator for insecurity. The CVE system is pretty bad and rulings are mostly arbitrary. For example, there was a recent curl "CVE", where an overflow happened in some part of the app which was not relevant to security. I don't remember the details, but the only solution to this apperent mess was that the main contributor of curl is becoming one of the guys that evaluate CVEs.

    CVE is a measure for the US government, and always assumes the worst in any case.

    That being said, I agree with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments