▲ 108 ▼ Nothing's iMessage solution might not be as secure as we thought (www.androidpolice.com) submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) deleted permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bipta@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago Your security is actually worse than a pinky promise in that case because you also have to consider that they could be hacked. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LinuxSBC@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago Beeper is pretty good with it, as they make it clear that it's insecure and use an encrypted protocol to get the messages to the server. Still, it's better to host your own (which Beeper lets you do, as it's just Matrix) or not use it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bipta@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago Your security is actually worse than a pinky promise in that case because you also have to consider that they could be hacked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LinuxSBC@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago Beeper is pretty good with it, as they make it clear that it's insecure and use an encrypted protocol to get the messages to the server. Still, it's better to host your own (which Beeper lets you do, as it's just Matrix) or not use it. permalink fedilink source parent