Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it::Apple still sells expensive "Pro" computers with just 8GB of RAM and charges a fortune for more.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Alternate title: Apple charges fortune for underspecced machines, morons still buy them

Please tell me, as someone who has not given Apple money in over a decade, how I am paying for this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (23 children)

    Apple fan here, and I love what they’ve done with hardware the last few years. That said…. I have to agree. Base RAM config is silly low, and higher RAM and SSD configs are stupid expensive. It’s a money maker for sure, I wish it wasn’t so obviously a cash grab. I’d be ok with a bit more padding in the base hardware price if the ram wasn’t so expensive to upgrade.

    In the old days this was a moot point because you buy base config and immediately swap for after market big sticks- I did that for decades, but these days with soldered RAM and storage…. Eh, it’s a bit of a kick in the balls.

    I am stoked for my new M3 next week though, good thing work pays for it!

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 80 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The closing sentence of the article....

    "as Apple customers, we shouldn’t stand for it"

    Apple customers....

    "Here's my $200"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 58 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    "we're all paying for it"

    Journalism these days is fucking awful

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    [...] we're all paying for it

    How? How am I paying for Apple's shortcomings?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Well, every competitor to Apple used to have expandable storage on their flagship phones. Removable batteries too that were a breeze to replace if they went bad. They all copied apple, and terrible storage and glued in batteries that are hard to replace is standard now. U have to pay 100 x what a micro SD for the same amount of storage would be, and replacing a battery, while possible to do on your own now requires special knowledge and tools. If you're building your own PC, it probably doesn't affect your PC, but laptops have also followed suit. Glued in batteries/ hard drives are the norm, and it's way harder to modify a shelf model laptop than it was 10 years ago. Apple is the King of enshittification. I'm so tired of companies copying them and all their greedy, customer fucking moves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    i'm still mad about the headphone jack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Memory is memory. Apple's attempt at branding these machines as "different" as if they were more efficient at using that memory, is absolutely fucking stupid. These Pro machines are used for large file operations like videos, and their response is simply "guess you need to pay more".

    I feel like they're trying to get back to the PPC days where generally available parts are not cheap. I hope plenty of cheap alternatives show up on Newegg or wherever. Fuck this bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Memory is memory

    Definitely not true hardware-wise. L2 cache is different from DDR3 RAM is different from DDR4 RAM... in price and performance

    Software-wise, yes, the operating system abstracts away the differences and memory is memory

    Apple's memory upgrade costs are probably 90% usual Apple bullshit pricing, 10% grounded in reality. I'm thinking that the 10% may be something like the motherboards are designed without memory upgrades in mind, so if you want more RAM, they have to use a special mobo which they prefab less of

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Apple's "memory upgrade" is making the claim that you can do with half for the same amount of work on x86. It is 100% untrue.

    You tried to delve into speed. But speed won't outpace a 1TB video file you're trying to edit. If you're working with smaller chunks of smaller files that have fast operations ONLY, then make claim as such. This is a ploy for upgrade cash, plain and simple. Nothing about these chips moves the needle on memory usage BY HALF. What a dumbass thing to assert as a company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Memory speed doesn't really matter if your apps start thrashing

    Edit: thrashing is very likely to occur on something marketed as "pro". I have a work PC with 8gb of RAM, and my job requires me to edit video. I need to be careful on how big my video files are, because it WILL start thrashing. This is the reality. Professional apps require a lot of memory pages, and they are never open on their own.

    Edit 2: I guess the thoughts from a computer scientist are less important than corporate marketing.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I absolutely love Apple Silicon—the performance to power ratio is wonderful, and the high-speed memory makes things like LLMs work great—but the RAM upcharge is insane, and shipping anything "Pro" with 8GB of RAM should be criminal in 2023.

    I really hope that Qualcomm can make some noise with their new laptop/desktop processors. Anything to light a fire under Apple's ass and make them stop skimping on RAM.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Damn, even my phone got 8GB memory

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago

    It seemed obvious to me that they do this so that they can say the MBP costs “as low as X”, but in fact everyone needs to pay at least $200 more

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not paying for it, I just go to downloadmoreram.com, DUH

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 25 points 2 years ago (11 children)
    load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    RAM is boring... THE FINISH IS TITANIUM!!!

    THAT'S LITERALLY OUR ENTIRE MARKETING CAMPAIGN!

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We are? Pretty sure I ain't.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    *fan bois are paying for it

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    It's even worse when you consider there's no dedicated video memory, so this is shared between graphics and the rest of the system.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Yes. Unfortunately people who buy Apple don't care. This is what happens when you prioritise brand and design over functionality. You end up paying more for the brand (worse shit, but hey you can feel good about buying such a great product!).

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I can't believe that Apple would do this. It's so not like them to cripple great machines with one horrendous bottleneck. Like could you imagine if they released an iMac in 2020 that they sold until the release of the M1 iMac that had a 1TB hard drive in it as a boot device? That'd be insane.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    He's paying for it. Many of us don't buy Apple products.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    I recently had to replace my Mac and was not at all happy with the ridiculous 8GB default. Ended up getting my first Windows machine in 10+ years. Same for my sis, she really wanted a Mac but work was only going to shell out $1500. You can get a helluva Windows machine for $1500 (64GB of RAM and 2TB HD). Sure it may not be “Retina” or have an insane color profile, but like great TVs, most people can’t tell unless they’re right next to a superior one.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Having had multiples of windows and linux laptops in the past, I’ve gotta say that one can’t put a price on convenience and UX. I never liked using a laptop, carrying one around, especially working with one, until I ate my pride and tried a MacBook.

    This is entirely subjective though. Previously I always compared the specs like that too, but I’ve come to realize there’s plenty more to these products beyond what can be listed in the spec sheet and easily compared like that.

    But this is neither here or there, just that your message rang an old bell, and I thought I’d just chime in. I hope you have a great time with the new computers, we humans have different tastes and needs 😌

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Can you elaborate further on the benefits? I have a Mac mini M1, a MacBook Pro M2, a more powerful Lenovo laptop, a more powerful Dell XPS, and a more powerful windows desktop (on paper).

    I don't use them a lot, but thus far, I struggle to find any benefit to MacOS. I use them because I have to and, generally, no longer than that. I mean, I might as well use Linux at that point and make my life easier and productivity faster. Mac keyboard shortcuts are an absolute nightmare to me (but maybe I'm just not used to them?)

    I must be missing something, because some people swear by them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I dont't understand how anyone is skimping on memory.... All the memory fabs (micron, samsung, etc)took huge hits this year because of low prices and low sales

    Shouldn't companies be filling their devices to the brim with RAM? Is this just greed? What happened to the saying "cheap as chips"?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Damn. I wish there was some other alternative

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not that I doubt the power of complaining on a niche social media but… https://www.apple.com/feedback/macbookpro.html Here’s a feedback form if you want to let Apple know it’s too much…

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I doubt the average Apple customer even looks at specs. They just see the Apple badge and are sold.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Nah bro, we are all NOT. I would only touch a Apple product if it had tits.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    I'll never understand brand loyalty, for the price of a Mac you can get a machine that's 10x more powerful with the same software being available in Windows.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Except a lot of the software isn't available. There are pros and cons to both. I've done windows, Linux and now I have a MacBook. It's better than Linux and Windows in a lot of ways but also worse in a lot of ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›