One of the few things that differentiates the major distros is the package manager. I've been running void on my laptop for the last 3 years and love it. XBPS is super fast and easy to use. It has never left me with a broken system either. That said, I've got the itch to switch.

I am looking at rolling / up to date distros. I'm inclined to use CLI when available.

I've been considering Opensuse, but last time I used zypper it was painfully slow. Has it gotten any better?

I was thinking of trying Alpine, how is APK?

Not interested in *butu, but apt seemed okay.

What's your favorite and how does it behave?

all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

Stick to Void. Everything else will look slow. Haven't moved since I started using it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Void was a great experience last time I used it. A minimal set of tools/software were installed(for some reason, I dislike ISOs/distros that fill everything from Libre Office to an FTP client in it; I will just download them if I want it), the package manager seemed pacy enough and system was fast. It is definitely one of the better distros I have tried.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's definitely hard to beat: )

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I run Void a netbook from 2012, I am always blown away when it resumes from sleep faster than I can open the lid. For the first day I thought maybe it wasn't suspending and sleep was broken.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you don't want Ubuntu, you can still have Debian. All the apt goodness without the Canonical drama.

    Ever consider Gentoo?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I haven't honestly. Isn't that one that takes forever to install because it builds the packages as you install the system?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Forever, no! Sure, compiling Firefox with some flags on my slow system can take ahem, time but I can install Gentoo in couple of days.

    Though, in all seriousness, Gentoo takes a notch higher than Arch and unlike Arch, which has many entry level distros based on it, Gentoo has comparatively lesser. It's fully usable but takes some initial time configuring and setting up the system exactly to the user's requirements. The package manager is portage, I think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You're going to be impressed with NixOS. You might still hate it because of the learning curve, but it offers you the ability to have both stable and nightly packages in one system.

    If you mess something up, you can just boot into the previous configuration.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I know, so cool. I am open to learning, but I am not sure I am in for that depth of education :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    APK is really fast

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Not a global opinion here as many hardcore linux users will stand by Arch or Mint, but I always have preferred Debian. It's what Ubuntu is based on, so it uses apt(itude), yet it's not prebloated Ubuntu and much more true to adaptation and unedited software than Ubuntu has become... But in the end it's more personal choice and taste, so usually requires a bunch of failed attempts to get one that fits, as every linux can basically do the same things, yet on some or other slightly different way... 😜

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I just want to add that for Debian with a rolling, up-to-date experience, Siduction does that nicely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Forgot to mention that, but indeed, Sid works pretty well...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Thanks, Sid hasn't been on my radar. Ill go have a look. I happen to have a ZFS box up in rsync.net running Debian, and it'd be nice to learn more about CLI in the deb world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Just clarifying in case there's a mix-up: Siduction is a desktop distro based on Debian Sid, not exactly the same distro. It's my favorite take on Debian so far but honestly I always have something to grumble about in apt-world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I did kinda assume you meant Debian's Sid, tbh. Hadn't heard of Siduction as a Distro. Siduction being the actual long name of Debian Sid sounded very plausible. 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    APK/Alpine is great! And the Edge repos are well stocked.

    Chimera Linux seems to be using even newer apktools than Alpine, not sure what the deal with that is. But that distro is still in early stages with limited repos for now.

    Pacman/makepkg/Arch is great too, and an obvious consideration for your usage, curiously omitted from your post.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Ah Chimera. I've been looking at that the last two days. I am really tempted to give it a shot. My laptop is mostly for playing around these days. Are you running it?

    I forgot about Arch. I ran Manjaro for a year and didn't have the best experience. 'Course I was pretty green on Linux then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I would recommend playing around with containers instead of doing a reinstall. Containers give a similar experience without so much work

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    LXC is killer. You can spin up containers that 'feel' exactly like a VM but with way less overhead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    apk isn't any more or less than using dpkg by itself, or opkg. As for what I use, I use Arch at home and Ubuntu on my virtual machines (because they're officially supported by my hosting provider). They work for me. I like them.

  • source
  • [+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Thanks for the heads up. That is something I've taken into consideration. I am curious how long I'd last on musl.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    I’ve been considering Opensuse, but last time I used zypper it was painfully slow. Has it gotten any better?

    No, I am using TW for years and despise its package manager slowness. Apart from that though, TW is great. Have void on my laptop as well, sadly rarely use it currently.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago*

    Alpine is great! Apk is super fast. The package selection isn't then best, but it's on-par with dnf and apt. My one gripe is musl/openrc issues, but you're already used to that if you use Void

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Went with Arch and Fedora simply for the parallel downloading. I tried xbps , the only turn off for me was the fact that feature was missing otherwise void is best to stick with.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)