148
Microsoft claims: Steam Deck Did Not Need Call Of Duty To Succeed (gameranx.com)
submitted 3 years ago by [M] to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz
59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 119 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Nobody needs CoD to be Successful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    It's such a weird take, i don't remember any platform CoD had impact.

    PC was big before, Nintendo is doing their own thing, smartphones were big before and Sony / Microsoft had both CoD anyway

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 60 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    This was just more MS propaganda so they could buy Activision and consolidate. Further harming gaming competition. It shouldn't be taken as anything but twisted truth for a profit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    I'm conflicted. On one hand, monopoly is absolutely bad.

    On the other hand, Kotick is an abusive, greedy asswipe who is directly responsible for some of the worst trends in AAA gaming; the sooner he gets the boot, the better we all are.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    My conflict lies more with how Sony fucked up gaming with their exclusive deals for the last decade or so and now Microsoft is pulling the Uno reverse on them, where I as a PC gamer lean more towards Microsoft. That's the part of this merger I personally like to a degree.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    Two decades. There was the dead years between ~2004 and 2012ish where both MS and Sony played the exclusive game. Then MS realized they could double down and get PC exclusives as well as Xbox, but with PC they don't have to eat the hardware costs

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    Kotick is an abusive, greedy asswipe who is directly responsible for some of the worst trends in AAA gaming

    And that's why giving him a payout is good?

    the better we all are.

    I don't think I'm better off when Blizzard games will be exclusive to MS platforms.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    He's reported he wants to leave. Because he'll become an even bigger billionaire. But there's no guarantee that we've seen, is there? He's egotistical enough he may want to stay on.

    MS has lately had a fairly light touch on their acquisitions. They just want their profits to be theirs and to use their IPs to push Xbox sales.

    But even if he leaves, it's unlikely MS is going to radically shift their games to be more consumer friendly. CoD and King already prey on children and make bank doing it. MS isn't throwing that away.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 27 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    "So, what Valve invested in was WiNE, a protocol […]". Ah, game journalists; the profession where sniffing glue will actually give you an advantage

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago

    It’s amazing how so many people are falling into the trap and arguing against or even in favor of Microsoft’s CoD argument.

    A single game of whatever size or importance is not the problem. But it’s in Microsoft’s best interest that the discourse keeps being this lacking in nuance and centered in aspects like this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    LMAO as if anyone needs that shit to have measurable success

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Why can't the steam deck run COD exactly? Is Microsoft trying to ship it as some alien UWP app

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 55 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Malware labeled "anticheat software" that wants obscene access to low level OS information and is a massive security liability.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 36 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    A new whitepaper published August 24th to Trend Micro explains how the perfectly legitimate driver mhyprot2.sys was used, absent any other parts of Genshin Impact, to gain root access to a system.

    I think maybe you should re-evaluate your definition of "perfectly legitimate".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Just like the Mafioso "perfectly legitimate businessmen" who offer fire insurance and personal injury insurance door to door, after dark. Be a real shame if something were to happen.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I can understand that bugs happen. It's absolutely possible for well intentioned software to have a fatal flaw that leads to catastrophic security breaches.

    But there's no scenario where a game having that access is defensible. It's gross overreach that can't possibly be in good faith and you deserve all the hate you get if anything bad happens.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The way people who cheat talk about input modifier devices leaves a bad taste in my mouth, so I can understand why a driver level system was considered.

    Cheaters in online games really are the worst type of people because they feel entitled to ruin other peoples games. It’s one thing to “level up” your solo experience. It’s a different thing to intend to ruin someone else’s.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (5 children)

    Even if we pretended it was possible for their anticheat to work (it isn't), it's pure unredeemable evil to think it's possible for there to be a scenario you're entitled to that access.

    If 50 percent of players were cheaters without that access and literally no one ever cheated again with it, you would be a monster to consider using it. It should be a criminal offense with mandatory jail time to the CEO and board of directors for every single computer it's installed on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
    load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago*

    Let's punch a huge hole in the OS and go from there. That sounds perfectly reasonable.

    I could maybe somehow understand it, if it would bring you absolute safety from cheaters, the funniest part about this is, the cheat devs are still above them, so just throw in the towel of trying to destroy the safety of legitimate players devices if you are still losing anyway.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (8 children)

    Has the steam deck succeeded? It's a cool device but less than 2% of steam users bought a deck. It's not as big as any active console. It's working to gain support but I hope the next stepping stone will be steam releasing a desktop OS made for desktop usage. (It won't be though. It will be a steam deck hardware iteration.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 28 points 3 years ago

    It outsold all expectations and was successful enough that it brought several traditional PC makes (Asus and Lenovo) into the market.

    It's obviously sold less than established consoles, but it's done well for itself. Also even though it's a small percentage of steam users, it seems to represent some of the more active players/spenders on steam. Thanks to that, steam deck players seem to be an actually significant percentage of steam sales for many games despite the lower number of steam deck players.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    less than 2% of steam users bought a deck.

    Well seeing as there are a billion accounts and 120M active users, that's a LOT of decks sold. Numbers online saying 1.2M decks sold which is a lot for a niche PC handheld. There's already copycats.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Sure, it's 2.6 million Decks sold (the most recent numbers). It's a lot but the deck isn't successful because of the number of sales. It's Valve finding a foothold in the console market by making hardware that didn't have hardware issues. The deck is only successful because Valve is already successful enough to take the first loss on a console to prove its hardware. The Steam Deck 2 is likely gearing up to be the thing that brings new players into the Valve ecosystem to really make them money. In a roundabout way, Valve is only successful because CoD and games like CoD are already being sold on Steam so they could amass this profit. So while the Steam Deck doesn't directly need CoD, Valve needs CoD. Hardware isn't something console manufacturers profit off of by much anyways.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    I think suggesting that Valve need any given game (CoD) or even genre ("games like CoD") to remain successful is silly at best. Of course Steam, the Steam Deck, and as a result Valve are only successful or even exist at all because of video game studios and publishers. But Call of Duty specifically? Nah man, it's a blip on the radar for Steam.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago*

    Valve are only successful or even exist at all

    Only as successful as they currently are.

    They would have still been successful based on their games, I think, and without steam to "distract" them, they might have counted to 3 by now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The deck is only successful because Valve is already successful enough to take the first loss on a console

    This may be true(and I wouldn't doubt it being the case, at least on the $399 model) but it's pure speculation on your part.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    There are a dozen consoles like the Steam deck that didn't have the impact that Steam had. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_handheld_game_consoles It's not pure speculation. It's certainly backed by history. Playstation is the other company that tried this and was big enough to release 2 iterations of a failed handheld that was very good on all accounts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    While I disagree with your core argument about the success of the Steam Deck, I absolutely agree that I'd love to see a desktop variant of SteamOS become available for general use. To the point that I'd likely even finally make the leap from Windows.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    2% of a large number is a large number

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It's 2.6 million. The Vita sold 16 million and the PSP sold 80 million. So to put the 2.6 million into perspective with new handhelds. It doesn't seem to have done great. The N-Gage from Nokia was 3 million sold units. The 2% is just how many Linux users on Steam there are which is absolutely inflating the numbers. The numbers I see reported specifically for Steam Decks sold are estimated to be 3 million by the end of 2023. I don't think that many people took Linux off of their Steam deck. Also, the estimate is by Omdia which didn't explain how they got their 2022 numbers or how they estimate 2023 numbers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It's not even available yet in my country and im sold, among a dozen of my friends.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Sure and that's great but it's better to look at these things with a better lens than just your friends or people who surround you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    I am not very familiar with the gaming industry (casual gamer only) but, while the argument is true, the conclusion that the big players can apply monopolistic practices without constraints leaving smaller players unaffected, is simply false.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Z. Zstd.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    load more comments
    view more: next ›