▲ 148 ▼ Microsoft claims: Steam Deck Did Not Need Call Of Duty To Succeed (gameranx.com) submitted 3 years ago by Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz [M] to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz 59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] dlove67@feddit.nl 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) I was only talking about your claim that they're selling at a loss, nothing about success or not. We don't know their BOM so its speculation that they're taking a loss. (Unless I misunderstood your claim) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago Sorry, I mean the overall loss. Not selling at a loss from a manufacturing point but a loss on the development and research of a console. They spent years just designing and building prototypes of the Steam Deck. It is an assumption but I think a fair one to say that they've yet to make their money back from those costs to break into the console industry. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago Sorry, I mean the overall loss. Not selling at a loss from a manufacturing point but a loss on the development and research of a console. They spent years just designing and building prototypes of the Steam Deck. It is an assumption but I think a fair one to say that they've yet to make their money back from those costs to break into the console industry. permalink fedilink source parent