And I thought Americans were carbrained, holy shit.

(To be fair, he's not wrong in that this is intended to keep the auto companies and the government nice and fat -- but the obvious response to this is to agitate for better public transit, not railing against an environmentally sound policy.)

The article in question.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 110 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sadly 1km is not the dumbest distant i have seen

Back when I walked my kids to school a parent who shared a fence with the school would drive them around a piece of grass the the front of the school and drop them of. The path through the grass was along side their side garden wall and shorter than the road they drove.

Of course it was a huge 4x4 to boot

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I used to live next to some folk who would drive 300 metres to the gym

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, that one always gets me: and then they run 5 miles on a treadmill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I always thought the equipment should all be hooked up to some sort of generator somehow so that the place could turn all that energy being spent exercising into electricity for the lights etc. There could also be pancakes 🥞

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    You need an exercise bike to produce something like a few hundred watts at most, if you can keep up an intense session. Continous stable power generation will be lower.

    And everything which isn't a bike will have much lower peak power generation capacity, and will be less efficient too

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    I used to walk 500m round trip to nearby restaurant for lunch, everyone i met will comment on how far that is. Of course, i take it to heart and now drive my 4x4 there.

    Nah just kidding, i now ride a bike, often 3.5km round trip for lunch.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 103 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Isn't it true that once a car is built, it's basically better for the environment to drive it until its wheels fall off instead of scrapping it to buy any new one (even electric) though ? He's right that a lot of the time these schemes are thinly veiled auto industry handouts to stimulate the economy, instead of actual environmental regulations.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Every 35000 km or 21000 miles a gasoline car going on average 20km/l or 47mpg have produced the same amount of CO2 that it takes to make an electric car.

    So if over the lifetime of the car you go less than 35000km you shouldn't be changing it with an electric. Otherwise please do 😁

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How long is that offset including charging? I know that EVs are still significant better, but it's not like the moment an EV rolls out that it's carbon emissions stop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    The thing with EVs is that they get cleaner over time as cheap solar and batteries become a bigger part of the grid and old coal plants age out.

    If you buy a diesel today, it'll still be burning diesel in 2045.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago*

    depends where you are i guess. if you're in a country with a high proportion of the grid being powered by renewables or nuclear then the emissions do become negligable as soon as it's delivered.

    France is 70% nuclear plus renewables etc

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Isn't it true that once a car is built, it's basically better for the environment to drive it until its wheels fall off instead of scrapping it

    In terms of global warming; maybe. It depends on many factors when looking at a specific case. Another commenter already put some numbers together.

    The environment, however, in this case is Dehli, a city with terrible air quality. Removing an active source of CO2, NOx, heavy metals, etc is good for that environment. Especially human lungs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Policies like these are almost never about overall environmental health. It's to address acute problems. Delhi has a lot of smog that causes health problems. That is the specific problem they're addressing

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 63 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'd be mad if the government forced me to get rid of my working car too. I think a better option would be to do something like not allow new gas cars to be manufactured or registered to people. Like stop issuing license plates for gas cars rather than forcing everyone to get rid of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    On the streets of New Delhi this will probably take just as long as walking. Need the AC though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I've been to Mumbai, and 1km is fine for us Europeans, but depending on their location, it can be a life-threatening experience due to the intense traffic, pollution and heat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That sounds really dangerous. Someone should ban fuel there to make it safer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Unfortunately fuel being burned in other countries is still heating up their environment.

    Also idk if you've heard, but India isn't exactly a rich place. A lot of people can't afford EVs. Despite the fact that yes, the Indian market has cheap options available. But my man in the tweet has been nursing a Hyundai i10 for 15 years. He ain't exactly trying to spend money on cars.

    The entire policy is designed to hurt poor people that are car dependent (if you look at the photo of the street in his other tweet, you'll see why he isn't walking the 1 kilometer. There's no sidewalk).

    If the government also gave him a good public transit option with AC, the fuel ban could easily be justified. As it is now, rich people will buy newer cars and poor people will be criminals, or take on debt they can't afford to get buy newer cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Yeah it’s the heat, pollution, and safety (not sure about sidewalks there though) rather than distance. I used to live in a tropical country and walked just a little over 1km to work. I had to wear a running shirt and change into my actual shirt when I arrived at the office because I’ll be drenched in sweat. I also had to wear a mask because of the pollution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    ITT: Some people want OOP's wife and kid to walk to school on what's essentially a highway. Others seem to realize that there might be a reason why OOP's wife needs the car, and given that OOP's done 65000 km in 15 years, he's not exactly doing a whole lot of driving with it.

    There's also suggestions of using public transport, but if that even exists for their route, OOP's wife can't exactly just go walk on a bus, she could get gang raped, because this is Delhi.

    We're not talking about a big SUV either. It's a tiny little hatchback, the most city-friendly car possible:

    The situation sucks for everyone involved. Whereas in the west we're used to it being just a transit availability issue, in parts of the world there's also the safety issue. Yes, the famous gang-rape-set-on-fire-murder case was 13 years ago, but that doesn't mean Delhi is magically safe now. It's still a huge issue.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

    What's this about? Government-mandated to reduce emissions? Switching to electric, or just "better" ICE cars?

    AFAIK pollution is a serious problem in India's cities - but people like this guy are going to defend their "personal freedoms" (cleverly masked as economical concern) tooth and nail.

    edit: I stand corrected. This is someone being upset about bad policy. Still, the "wife" and "1km", both suggesting this is a secondary vehicle, triggers me. Standard upper middleclass griping.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Government-mandated to reduce emissions?

    On the surface, yes. In reality they're just offloading environmental responsibility on to citizens (and making them buy "better" ICE cars so the auto industry gets the profits) instead of improving and expanding public transit to make it easier to get around without a car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Whoa! Cool it.

    The mandate isn't from "government". Apparently, the government failed to do much about pollution, so a regulatory body was set up by the courts, which body did some good things (ban diesels) but also some hamhanded things like judge only based on technology age rather than the odometer. Throwing away a ton of steel and manufacturing that has had minimal utilization isn't going to help any.

    You should've dissed the people who made scrapping the dedicated bus lane an election issue some years ago. I guess that never made it to the newspapers, and hence wasn't discussed online either.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Certainly seems so. From the picture the OOP posted, it doesn't look like there's paved walkways

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A 5-8kg school bag is insane. What the hell is going on there? Where I live, it's only 2kg.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Lucky you. I think school bags in many countries, even developed ones are at an abuse level. When I was 12 my bag often weighed 10kg+, no lockers. I had hoped the situation had improved until I spoke to my 20 years younger cousin, it's still the same shit. I believe it is probably a major contributing factor to scoliosis and kyphosis for children and teenagers, but still it persists

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    Don't complain about 1km school runs until you have tried to do it on foot - in Delhi. Using a car might be the only halfway safe method in that area.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Bro your title is misleading.

    Indian man upset that the government is forcing him to buy a new car

    Your title makes the man sound like he's complaining about his wife

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›