top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 178 points 2 years ago (4 children)

And it fucking blows now. You don't get shit but ads.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    They’re somehow WORSE than duckduckgo nowadays like how? You were the search leader, people used DDG for privacy reasons but they passed you??? Did you forget why you’re a company? It’s because you were the best fucking search engine ever and you decided to sell that title for ads or some shit. Incredible how Google fell off the fucking side of a mountain they themselves built!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Is ddg actually good now? I remember it feeling nearly useless waay back when it was first hitting the scene. Might have to give it a shot again

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    I only use Google if DDG can't find what I'm looking for. Usually Google doesn't either if DDG can't so lately I've been giving up after the DDG results. I can't stand Google anymore. The first page of results is just ads and the next page is all irrelevant nonsense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah it's so bad, the auto predictions dont even make sense any more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    the auto predictions always give me more words than i need, so i have to type normally, like it wasn't there, or select, hope it doesn't load, and delete the extra words

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And when i go to click on an auto prediction it changes it at the last damn second too. That drives me mad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is my beef with basically all modern interfaces. Stuff changes and moves with just enough of a delay to cause me to miss click. Autocomplete changing recommendations on phones, UI elements shifting on web pages, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    This has been something so frustrating that nobody seems to talk about. They really need to provide autofill that only adds the one next word, rather than two or three. Because otherwise, the autofill becomes useless.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 64 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I dunno on one side we have Google trying to wreck the entire internet and have their ads in your face 95 percent of the time.

    On the other side is Microsoft who won't leave you the hell alone when pushing they're shit tiers programs and steal defaults on a weekly basis.

    To me the only solution is ruling both companies monopolys and fining them to hell and breaking them up. Both are out of control and ruining computing and the Internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    Google could be broken up into

    • search
    • chrome / gsuite
    • YouTube
    • gcloud
    • ads
    • android. And I'm sure more

    MS

    • windows / office
    • azure
    • xbox
    • bing
      ..I'm too tired to keep going lol

    If those had to all survive independently and couldn't leech off profits of the parent organization we could have true competition. Instead you just need one super-profitable arm of a company than loss-lead your way into other verticals and out-compete everyone else because you don't have to turn a profit, at least while the competition is still clinging on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ads are a core component of how search makes money. They're also a core component of how YouTube makes money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They should have invested in their potential, their search engines. It's getting shittier almost daily.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 2 years ago

    *To stifle competition FTFY

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Relying on people's apathy is a business model with eras of success. Most people have never changed a setting other than dark mode, and even then that's probably your average superuser.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    you are actually onto something. When Neeva went under, they were a paid search engine, they made a post explain why. The hardest part was getting people to pay a monthly sub, but getting them to change the settings

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This validates my stubborn commitment to DuckDuckGo, ty

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago

    Crazy that it's cheaper to do that than it is to build a product that can find recipe blogs that aren't also novels.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I happily pay $10 a month for Kagi and it’s freaking great.

    I’m never going back to Google.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You pay for a search engine? You have a subscription to a search engine? I'm I understanding that right?

    It is a search engine right? My brain is struggling with this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Hopefully the antitrust trial will end up telling Google they cannot pay anybody for preference of their browser. That would be the best outcome.

    The MO of current "market leaders" is not to compete but gatekeep.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    I'd gladly switch back to Google if they paid me a million dollars.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    how is that not anti-competitive behaviour?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Antitrust was just a nice idea. It's kinda dead. Will remain dead unless we can purge corruption from politics. For some reason, most politicians seem averse to this idea.

    Luckily the party driven and heavily influential political roles are filled with diverse representatives from every walk of life and aren't largely built around the same support circles and ideals that have already been entrenched for generations. With millions of citizens, its normal for the same handful of families to remain in power, with the exception of some rich celebrities who can win the popularity polls.

    Everything is fine.

    As long as the rich can get more money. That's what is most important.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    It isn't the default search engine on my browser. I'm using Kagi at the moment.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] [B] 8 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Even if it’s easy to switch browsers or platforms or search engines, the one that appears when you turn it on matters a lot.

    Google obviously agrees and has paid a staggering amount to make sure it is the default: testimony in the trial revealed that Google spent a total of $26.3 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine in multiple browsers, phones, and platforms.

    It was made public after a debate earlier in the week between the two sides and Judge Amit Mehta over whether the figure should be redacted.

    (Apple’s outsize percentage of the total is why that particular deal has been such a focus of the first weeks of the trial.)

    Until now, these numbers have been closely held secrets, leaving competitors and analysts to speculate about exactly what it’s worth to Google to be the near-universal default choice.

    He also said that he sees Yelp and Amazon as competitors and that, in such a hot market, Google has to do everything it can to stay relevant and compete.


    The original article contains 519 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Approximately 16% of their revenue or 29% of their profit. I'd take that tradeoff any day.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›