You criticize society, yet you participate in it!
post
replies:
Ain't payin no $80 for no game
replies:
Man, there better be a ton more content than the original to command that price. The first was a decent game, but it felt pretty boring to me, and it's wild that they could use a whole solar system as the setting and it feel so small.
[deleted]
replies:
"Capitalism subsumes all critique"
tbh a 20$ game isn’t any less capitalist
I will not be buying any game for $80. lmao
Being aware of the irony is free. How you respond is completely up to you.
I just looked it up, and I'm surprised to say that Spider-Man 2 (just released on PC back in February I believe) is still only $60. I mean, sure it's over a year old from it's original PS5 release, but the fact they're not asking $80 for it is kinda nice.
And Oblivion Remastered is "only" $50.
replies:
[deleted]
it's free on usenet. just saying.
will have 3 hours of content like the first one.
Microsoft sets the price and they whant you to subscribe to gamepass so they can lock you in and eventually shitefy it
isthereanydeal.com
freetokeep.gg
One of my favorite games is trying to get the best price on a game I want. My backlog is a few years long at this point, so I don't need to buy any new games. But if I can find one I want for 90% off or more, I usually buy it anyways.
Developers need to eat and pay rent.
replies:
Once again I have to remind people that inflation exists. Game prices go up just like everything else and the last few years have seen insane inflation rates and game prices haven't really climbed since the 90s. $60 in 2019 would be worth $75 today. $60 in 1996 would be worth $122.
replies:
all 48 comments