all 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 220 points 2 years ago (4 children)

What a crock of shit. Johnson & Johnson netted $17 billion USD in 2022, so it's not like they can't afford to pay any settlements. They just don't want to. In the last 5 years they netted 84 billion dollars, and that is all profit. Yeah, fuck you, J&J

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I'm against corporal punishment, but I think there are white collar crimes that should carry the death penalty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    While it's not all the way there, the "depraved heart" rule does exist.

    It allows the court to consider extreme indifference to the safety of others as being so depraved that it can be considered intent to kill - elevating wrongful death to 2nd degree homicide.

    An example would be a drug or auto manufacturer executive choosing not to issue a safety recall for financial reasons. The idea is there's clear knowledge that great harm is likely from their inaction, and they're actively choosing to inflict that harm.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Isn't that the point of limited liability corporations? To move profits into private pockets while keeping liabilities in the corporation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    That's not what they did tho. They did this instead ... and lower courts said no.

    J&J is among four major companies that have filed so-called Texas two-step bankruptcies to avoid potentially massive lawsuit exposure. The tactic involves creating a subsidiary to absorb the liabilities and to immediately file for Chapter 11.

    source here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Look up MNK/Mallinkrodt aka SpecGX. Just filed for bankruptcy right after emerging from bankruptcy in order to shed the original agreement of future products in lieu of fines or some such shit. Opioid manufacturer double bankruptcy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    The bankruptcy is a plan in place with counsel representing claimants so they can free up cash reserves and pay them.

    Notably, our appeal recently was joined by counsel representing the vast majority of the talc claimants," he said.

    They don't have enough cash on hand, so they bankrupt part of the company and sell.

    Everyone should read the article.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 69 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don't really trust this website, they seem to be pushing you towards their paid services rather than providing useful news.

    In any case, my understanding is that this is pretty old news. Also, it's not J&J filing for bankruptcy, but a spin-off subsiduary that they created after the fact and have given all the IP rights to. They've lost every step of the way so far because what they're trying to do is so transparent, they're trying to shirk liability when at the time it was all theirs and theirs alone.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Also, it’s not J&J filing for bankruptcy, but a spin-off subsiduary that they created after the fact and have given all the IP rights to.

    General Motors tried this same garbage tactic to get out of paying for their liability with mercury switches. General Motors declared bankruptcy, then created a NEW company called...General Motors. They transferred all the assets from old GM to new GM, and left all the liabilities with old GM. It took years, but a number of states sued and got a settlement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wish they hadn't settled on these matters. Sometimes things need to be brought to court - and when the state is involved there's less of an excuse not to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    IANAL but I believe there is significant legal precedent against this. Most notably the recent order preventing Purdue Pharma, and the Sackler family from that very protection.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    There's gotta be a better way to rephrase that and end up with a different abbreviation than "I ANAL." 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Does I Literally, Obviously, Vociferously, Emphatically Am Not A Lawyer work better?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You'd think so, but that's been a standard abbreviation around the Internet for at least 5 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago*

    Johnson and Johnson is evil. The company shall fail. The market has spoken. Accept the punishment for your crimes Johnson & Johnson.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wonder what Jamie would have to say about this. He should make a sequel, it's been 20 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    the CEO and the Board negotiate with the Supreme Court for their Golden Parachutes

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    But companies are people! We must protect the people! /s

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ill believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    As a Canadian I have never understood how your SCOTUS ruled that corps have the same rights as people. It makes no logical sense whatsoever.

    I mean people survived millennia without corps, but corps wouldn't survive one day without people. Ergo we are top of the pecking order here ... or should be anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago*

    My question is, when this shit passed, why did no one tell those fucks, "ok you're people too, which means the laws that pertain to a person are now applicable to whatever CEO and board members approved decisions that broke those laws." As it is right now, those fuckers get their cake and eat it too and it infuriates me to no end.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    But... but... but... bad science.

    (At least according to a lot of suspiciously popular redditors anyways)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)