Not only is Trump leveling science funding at NASA, like he did with the National Science Foundation, but look closely at the budget. Beginning next year at 800 million and by 2030, 3.5 billion (nearly 20% of its budget), NASA is required to work towards “Commercial Moon and Mars Infrastructure and Transportation”. The ultimate subsidy for the commercial space sector.

They also eliminated STEM engagement program, which provided funding for the next generation of scientists to participate in NASA opportunities. I can’t wait for all this greatness Trump has been preaching to arrive.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 122 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

So, we all know what's going on here, right? They're gutting any part of our society that relies on intellectual work and trying to compete with motherfucking robots to bring factories back. They want to cram everyone into sweatshops. The plan was never to bring good jobs back, the plan was always live-in factories and suicide nets on the windows.

E: well, at least the Roman space telescope lives on, I guess. I'm unreasonably excited for it; it's already built and just needs to be launched, basically.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    The Roman telescope will likely get shoved in storage. I work on it right now, we are talking internally about what this means. Obviously, I have no more information than you do, but the cuts are severe enough that there's no way we will be able to keep working on it at the current levels if this goes through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is the same vibe as when the CEO gets a million dollar raise but we don't have money for cost of living increases this year.

    Sorry USA kids. No astronaut program this summer. Dream smaller this year.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    So, Trump wants NASA to get to the Moon and Mars by 2030 while on a slashed budget with limited scientists? Get ready for more spacecraft to drop out of the sky.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Sadly, getting more places with less money is absolutely possible, but the key to making it happen is abandoning planetary science. It’s a shift from a paradigm where engineering exists to support planetary science efforts to engineering for engineering’s sake

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (28 children)

    It's okay. Europe and China will replace the US and the world will be better off.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • load more comments (26 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Don’t forget that women and marginalized populations are now being discriminated against.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Trump is doing more for the science programs in other nations than those nations ever could.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    It's not like American scientists and intellectuals will flee to other nations that value themselves more, crippling US innovation...right?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I seriously don't understand why he is doing this. Isn't trump friends with eslong musk? The way i'm seeing this is cutting the budget for nasa would only go against elon. If he wanted to save money, then he should have just cut military spending.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    His goal is a destroy the United States of America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is NASA a threat to Elon's monopolization of launches?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Arm up and say no fucking way goddammit

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    and we'll call the company, Union Aerospace Corporation

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›