top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 120 points 1 year ago (2 children)

man you guys need unions

here it's minimum two months notice by law, usually three by contract, increasing by one month per every five years. and you can basically only get fired for actively sabotaging business, doing illegal shit, or if there legitimately is nothing for you to do. and they still have to pay you for the entire time. like, i worked at a company that went bankrupt and after the estate or whatever it's called ran out of cash, the state paid out the final month.

flipside: it goes the other way too.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Have you no love for the shareholders who have invested their ill-gotten gains in these enterprises?!

    Have you no decency?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Well, my colleagues all knew in the day I was laid off in the morning before me. I only knew about it after it being announced in the afternoon because it was a day off for me. It was fun. People coming to say goodbye and me having no idea what they were talking.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sounds shitty. Why do companies do that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Let them go on Friday so they have the weekend to cool off. Minimises problematic post employment events.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    it's better for everyone if you negotiate layoffs and firings beforehand. No surprises and everyone gets their day in court. That is how the union system works in Sweden.

    American MBAs and HR managers are too cowardly to have tough discussions with their employees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    I was fired with no warning in the middle of the day on a Tuesday. Turns out I was the fall guy when the department had to cut costs because all the projects the director was coming up with to save money were actually costing the place more to implement. They said I wasn't good enough, but my one buddy there told me my work was just fine.

    Gave me some bad self-esteem issues that I'm still working on years later, but I did get a WAY better job 4 days after being fired. Last I heard they've gone through 5 people trying to fill in my position after they realized they needed me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I remember one past job when the company decided on a Friday to let someone go but thought it was best to wait until Monday morning to give them the news. Then he started the day and immediately got sacked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I remember being the server guy who had to stay late on Fridays and remove access at 6pm.

    I got a panicked call from someone who couldn't save the file he was working on. It was for a project set to go live on Tuesday.

    I had to break it to him that he was just let go.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That fucking sucks, for both you and him.

    Who doesn’t even bother to tell someone that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    In many companies access is removed before they're notified so vengeful employees can't go in and fuck things up right after being terminated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Man I've been there too. You do exactly what HR asks you to, when they ask you to do it and all of a sudden it's "oh whoops that's actually supposed to be next week)

    Or like the meme says, it sucks when you get an email telling you to term someone at the end of the week and you have to interact with them all week.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I worked on a 6 month project. At month 5, they said they are not renewing even tho they need the position.

    My team fought the VP and said if I don't continue it would be detrimental to the project.

    She renews me for another 6 months and makes me fly to an off-site to present at an mbr.

    The VP proceeds to cancel my contract the day I land in San Francisco. Because she doesn't want a remote worker anymore and wants this person to come in 4 days a week.

    Corporate doesn't care about you. You need to be selfish because nobody will care about you otherwise.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm sorry you dealt with that, an I'm very familiar with it. You're absolutely right, to management you are nothing more than a drone. It doesn't matter how important you are to the company, what level you are, once they have decided you're out it's over. There is no amount of fighting, rallying, or anything you can do. They will find a way to oust you.

    Same applies if you're in an HR thing, a legal thing, just got on someone's bad side. Even if you win, they'll just fabricate a reason to get rid of you with just enough data to justify it in court. As soon as you catch wind, start looking for your next place

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    I have been jaded enough that I'm sort of numb to it now. I'm only working towards my retirement. Office gossip, dynamics, culture means nothing to me. 90% of my job is optics. The rest is real work. My only job is to try and keep my job as long as possible and nothing more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Anyone else dislike the phrase "let go" in this context? It sounds like you're doing them a favor, or they were being held hostage, or giving them permission to do something. I'd prefer "fired" or "terminated", even though those have their own connotation problems.

    Meme's relatable, though. This capitalist hellscape is awful.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The phrase "let go" is definitely PR speak. It makes it sound less aggressive than "fired" or "terminated".

    I have heard arguments that "fired" has the implication that the employee is at fault and did something bad, but the argument is weak.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have heard arguments that "fired" has the implication that the employee is at fault

    Generally that's not an implication, it is the outright meaning. America is weird on that because you guys can be fired without cause; in the civilized world you're either fired (at fault), laid off (no work for you to do), or terminated with severance pay (because you're not at fault, but it also isn't a layoff).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Laid off would still mean severance pay in the civilized world. In my country it's either a layoff or a firing. I don't think you can do a termination without it being one of the two. What's the difference? Well with a layoff, even if you pay the employee their severance and everything... You can't just hire a new person to fill the role. The role needs to actually disappear for a while at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I used to think that there was a big difference between being "let go" and being "fired", in terms of what actually happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    If you're in a country with good worker protection, there's a big difference between 'made redundant' and 'fired for cause'. There is no 'fired for no reason'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Hint: only one of these comes with a so-called golden handshake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Redundancy doesn't necessarily come with a golden handshake, though many employment contracts do mandate it.

    But they do have to try to find you another job elsewhere in the organisation if that's possible, and they have to disestablish the position not necessarily you. That means that if they want to make one person from a team redundant, they generally have to actually ask if anyone wants to leave, and if not, run a transparent process to decide who from the team to make redundant, not just pick someone.

    You also have to not be planning to re-hire for the role any time soon as that would imply the redundancy wasn't genuine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    IT also often shares the burden of knowledge...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You were asked to be a total asshole and you complied.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I think it's also worth bearing in mind that he was told to by his bosses as part of his job. I understand it would be nice to let her know, but risking your employment (and therefore your income, home, healthcare, etc.), is a bad idea. Unfortunately I think OP was caught behind a rock and a hard place. The blame here falls on management, as it usually does, not on OP.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You should automate it so when the HR system fires someone the AD or Entra accounts are disabled and licenses are removed.

    But yea, it is the shit part.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 year ago

    Oh it is, but I still get notified ahead of time jic, especially since we're (mostly) remote, so there's no security approaching their desk if the network glitches and misses locking them out of Windows or some shit lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    I remembered a worse time (than being the one who kills access):

    One of my vendors had won the contract that my company currently held with an automaker. It was told to me in confidence, as they thought it was going to be announced later that month. I was also told because they were looking to hire me to keep all the day-to-day knowledge.

    It was finally announced... EIGHT. MONTHS. LATER.

    While I never said anything (it could have tucked a major deal and got myself and a few others in legal hot water), I was always quick to counsel my underlings to move to other positions or get jobs somewhere else.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    All Middle Managers Are Bastards

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I couldn't do it. I'd have shot him a text from my personal phone. The fact that I couldn't do that is probably why I've never even thought of trying to apply for a job like that.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›